My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 03 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 03 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 10:28:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/16/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 03 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
whether he needed an attorney to get through the process. If so, he felt that the City of <br />Louisville had a real problem. <br /> <br />Light replied that he would be happy to go over it with Mr. Lee or with the attorney <br />representing him, whichever Mr. Lee would prefer. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he was very disturbed when he initially saw the appeal and felt that it <br />was an abuse of the existing process. He asked Light whether the applicant could submit <br />his modified plans to the Planning Commission, or have them reconsidered by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Light replied that the answer to both questions is, yes. In this context, there is an <br />application filed, it was taken to Planning Commission and denied. Under the Code, you <br />are entitled to appeal that denial. You are also entitled, if you like, to ask the Planning <br />Commission for a reconsideration. Light stated that he understands that the applicant <br />filed a timely notice of appeal to have the appeal come up to the City Council. The only <br />reason it must be removed from tonight's agenda is that, under the Code, we have to give <br />notice by publication at least five days prior to the hearing and, unfortunately, it wasn't <br />done. <br /> <br />Davidson requested that Sam Light contact the applicant to go over the appeal procedure <br />and also place that information in writing to members of Council. <br /> <br />Davidson moved that Council approve the Agenda as amended, seconded by Sisk. All in <br />favor. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />Davidson called for any changes to the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br />Simmons stated that at last night's Finance Committee meeting, the Committee reviewed <br />the bid award for the sports complex playground. The amount of work required for the <br />project exceeded the appropriation. The Finance Committee recommends that the <br />additional funds needed to complete the playground structure, specifically the protective <br />netting around the structure plus a $2,000 bid overran, be taken out of the unencumbered <br />fund balance in the Conservation Trust Lottery fund. <br /> <br />Davidson replied that this does not appear to be a Consent Agenda Item and moved it to <br />Agenda Item 6N under Regular Business. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that representatives of the Centaurus Little League are in attendance tonight to <br />present Council with a donation for the playground structure. He suggested that Council <br />move this item to Agenda Item 6B-1, to be discussed prior to the presentation. <br /> <br />Davidson agreed and called for any other changes to the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.