My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 04 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 04 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 10:34:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/6/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 04 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayer asked Wood for the number of parking spaces that would be required if the square <br />footage specified in the Ordinance was added. <br /> <br />Wood replied that, in consideration of the approved PUDs, there is 52,500 sf of open <br />square footage available on the west side of the railroad tracks. <br /> <br />Howard stated that, at 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sf, this would require 147 parking spaces. <br /> <br />Mayer expressed concern for the Planning Commission's opinion that a FAR of 0.52 is <br />too low, as he is uncertain where the required parking spaces could be located without <br />tearing down buildings. He felt that the traffic study was fairly accurate. He asked Wood <br />how many parking spaces could be added downtown by purchasing the available vacant <br />property. <br /> <br />Wood replied he was uncertain, however, he would guess approximately 35-40. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he did not understand how a FAR of 0.52 was conservative when the <br />available square footage for development would require approximately 150 parking <br />spaces yet there is only vacant property available to provide 35-40 spaces. <br /> <br />Sisk agreed that there should be a clear differentiation between the east and west sides of <br />the railroad tracks. He stated that after considering an Ordinance addressing total square <br />footage or establishing a FAR, he expressed support for establishing a FAR of 0.52. He <br />agreed that transferable development rights would be necessary if this FAR was in place. <br /> <br />Lathrop stated that a FAR of 0.52 on a lot-by-lot basis assures no development will occur <br />downtown. His preference would be to apply the FAR of 0.52 across the Core area, in <br />conjunction with a transferable development rights program. <br /> <br />Keany agreed with Lathrop. He felt that placing a FAR of 0.52 would end all <br />development downtown. He stated that to tell downtown businesses that they cannot <br />develop until Council develops a transferable rights program is unreasonable. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that, not including the approved businesses that haven't been built; there <br />is approximately twenty-percent additional developable space. He asked for the number <br />of square feet that Business Answers proposed for their expansion. <br /> <br />Bill Simmons, City Administrator, replied that the total square footage approved was <br />18,970 sf. He stated that the existing square footage was 2, 340, leaving a net increase of <br />16,630 sf. <br /> <br />Davidson estimated that 52,000 sfwould allow for approximately 3-4 major expansions. <br />He stated that downtown Louisville has never seen that rate of expansion; therefore, it <br />would take some time to reach that. He expressed support for establishing square footage <br />by area, as he was uncertain how a transferable development rights program would work <br />for this area. He stated that during the eleven years he has been on Council, there have <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.