Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 10, 2024 <br />Page6of8 <br />Kari McDowell Schroeder, non-resident, conducted the applicant's traffic study. She <br />said that the restricted connection option was viable. She explained the findings of the <br />study, and noted that Griffith Street was covered in the most recent study. <br />Moline asked whether there was a point at which a grid street network becomes small <br />enough that it is no longer useful. <br />Schroeder said yes, as eventually the intersections could become too frequent such that <br />they would begin to impede the flow of traffic. It also depended on pedestrian walkshed. <br />Moline asked whether the constricted access to this site could become problematic for a <br />gridded street network. <br />Schroeder said that the site would effectively act as one block due to the surrounding <br />constraints like Highway 42 and the BNSF tracks. <br />Bangs asked if they had enough info from past traffic studies to extrapolate the traffic <br />produced by eliminating the Front Street connection. <br />Schroeder said that she did not know. <br />Bangs asked to confirm that the applicant would require a new traffic study to examine <br />this option <br />Schroeder said yes. <br />Hunt asked whether bollards could be used for to allow for emergency vehicle and bike <br />only access. <br />Schroeder said yes, and noted that there was the possibility of using retractable bollards. <br />Baskett asked if staff had given thought to possible street design regarding traffic <br />calming. <br />Fowlkes noted that the City had implemented traffic calming devices like speed humps <br />that could also be implemented on Front Street. He added that the City was planning <br />upgrades to the Highway 42 corridor that would aid in increasing vehicle capacity in the <br />area around the development. <br />There was an extended discussion about how traffic from the development could impact <br />Highway 42, and how the Front Street connection would play into this. There was also <br />further discussion about the scope of the traffic study, what kinds of trips were covered, <br />and what future traffic movements and access points could look like, particularly with <br />regard to left turns from Front Street onto South Boulder Road. <br />Zuccaro suggested that the Commission continue the item as it appeared they were <br />interested in seeing an updated traffic study before voting on the proposal. <br />Moline said that he felt this was a really important issue, and that it would be incumbent <br />on the Commission to review this study before they voted. <br />Moline asked about the applicant's plans for vegetation, and whether they planned to <br />retain any of the existing trees. He also asked for the applicant's views on the open space <br />dedication. <br />