My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 03 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2025 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 03 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:22:01 AM
Creation date
3/27/2025 8:47:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/20/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 20, 2025 <br />Page 2of5 <br />Councilmember Hamlington asked if the collections that came in to overcome the gap are included in the <br />baseline for projections. The Revenue & Sales Tax Manager responded that audit revenues are kept <br />separate and are only based on the sales tax amounts. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked when we have a projection for sales tax collected over the course of a <br />year, to what extent is it based on previous years versus assumptions of what percentage we think we will <br />get. The Sales Tax Manager responded that, because we use two-year projections, the final number this <br />year will be higher than what was previously included in the projections due to the consumer index. The <br />Finance Department will look at amending the budget based on how 2024 ended and use the consumer <br />index for inflation growth. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if the amount of compliance we are getting with sales tax is typical. The <br />Sales Tax Manager responded that there are definitely compliance issues in most municipalities and money <br />to be found through audits. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if we try to estimate how much we are losing from noncompliance. The <br />Sales Tax Manager responded that once businesses hit a threshold without compliance we audit them. We <br />started with over 900 out of compliance businesses last spring and we had 300 remaining at the end of <br />the year. There is still work to do. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if there is an ideal staffing level so that we're not having too many <br />people doing audits and/or paying for more staff than needed to do the work. The Director of Finance <br />responded that the current staffing size is appropriate, once fully staffed and trained, noting that he will <br />continue to monitor it. <br />Councilmember Hoefner commented that he would like to see projections conservatively realistic going <br />forward. <br />Public Comments: None. <br />2025 Sewer Fee Proposed Adjustments: <br />The Deputy Director of Utilities presented the proposed adjustments to the 2025 Sewer Fees. The <br />presentation was included in the meeting packet. The proposed adjustments will be presented to the City <br />Council for approval in March. <br />Committee Comments: <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if the number of equivalents is the same as the number of residents. <br />The Deputy Director of Utilities responded that the numbers are close; an equivalent is based on a single <br />family. The number of equivalents includes commercial meters. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked for clarification on how the calculations are applied. The Deputy Director <br />of Utilities provided clarification on how the calculations are applied. <br />4/143 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.