My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 05 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2025 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2025 11:00:59 AM
Creation date
5/20/2025 2:15:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/19/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Criteria and Standards <br />1. The effect upon the general historical <br />and architectural character of the structure <br />and property. <br />2. The architectural style, arrangement, <br />texture, and material used on the existing <br />and proposed structures and their relation <br />and compatibility with other structures. <br />3. The size of the structure, its setbacks, <br />its site, location, and the appropriateness <br />thereof, when compared to existing <br />structures and the site. <br />4. The compatibility of accessory <br />structures and fences with the main <br />structure on the site, and with other <br />structures. <br />5. The effects of the proposed work in <br />creating, changing, destroying, or <br />otherwise impacting the exterior <br />architectural features of the structure upon <br />which such work is done. <br />6. The condition of existing <br />improvements and whether they are a <br />hazard to public health and safety. <br />7. The effects of the proposed work <br />upon the protection, enhancement, <br />perpetuation and use of the property. <br />Met? Evaluation <br />Yes Even though the rear addition is <br />large, it is separated to the rear <br />through an underground passage <br />making it appear distinct and <br />subordinate to the original house. <br />Yes The proposed addition will use <br />materials that are architecturally <br />compatible with the historic <br />building. <br />No The proposed rear addition <br />encroaches into the rear setback. <br />The overall design in relation to <br />the adopted design standards is <br />not supported by staff. <br />N/A The proposal is for the building <br />only. No accessory structures are <br />included with this proposal. <br />No The proposed enlargement of the <br />front windows will impact the <br />exterior architectural features of <br />the building. This is a point of <br />conflict with the adopted design <br />standards applicable to the <br />property. <br />N/A No public health hazards are <br />identified with this proposal. <br />Yes The proposed work will not <br />negatively affect the future <br />usability of the building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.