Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: PARKS FUND — LONG-TERM FORECAST STRUCTURAL ISSUE <br />DATE: JUNE 11, 2025 <br />PAGE 4 OF 5 <br />2025-2026 Budaet Reductions <br />It should be noted that approximately $80,000 in operating funds were removed from the <br />2025-2026 budget to achieve a stable 5-year fund balance. These funds were primarily <br />removed from the Water & Professional Services line items based on historical trend <br />analysis and some recent turf conversions, but any future reductions will be subject to <br />annual operational reviews and priorities and these two operating lines are not expected <br />to have additional flexibility that would allow for more cuts. <br />As the intermediate forecast chart illustrates, currently any and all increases in costs to <br />the 211 Fund will have a direct correlation on the reduction of a different service area's <br />funding. Some of these increased costs currently paid from the 211 Fund are out of the <br />department's control: for example, employee benefits, wage increases, goods and <br />services cost increases, contracted labor, etc. If the projected revenues continue as <br />forecasted there will be a need to utilize fund balance just to maintain the basic expense <br />escalators within the next budget cycle. Again, this is only for operating expenses and <br />after 2025 does not include any allocated funding for capital -level infrastructure <br />improvements, new construction or basic depreciating asset management/deferred <br />maintenance projects. <br />General Maintenance Management Plan (GMMP) <br />Per the 2022 City Council reviewed Parks Division General Maintenance Management <br />Plan (GMMP) it was noted that with industry standard balancing of assets and park <br />acreage vs. current staffing levels the community should expect a maximum service level <br />2 or 3 (3 being average system quality, 2 being basic maintenance functions with areas <br />that would have lesser than average quality of service), however Louisville Parks staff <br />were actively delivering level 4 (above average) or 5 (excellent) service throughout the <br />entire Parks/Horticulture/Forestry/Streetscapes/Snow Removal system. <br />This level of "overachievement" based on industry standards was noted as unsustainable <br />and could lead to high staff turnover rates, decreased staff morale/performance and an <br />unrealistic expectation to align financial resources with the community's expectations. <br />This report estimated that the Parks Division would need an additional 5 FTEs to provide <br />long-term level 3 (average) service levels consistently. This report was completed using <br />the previous, more flexible & "pre-2C", funding models. <br />Since that report was submitted, the Parks Division staffing levels have remained at the <br />same numbers and operating funds, as noted above, have been reduced. However, the <br />service level expectations of the community remain the same (if not higher) and there <br />have been no formalized notifications or requests for service level reductions from the <br />City Manager or City Council. To the contrary, Parks has worked to utilize a new Asset <br />Management software to improve inventory controls, work productivity, effectiveness & <br />quality from staff and to extend the life expectancy of Park assets. Per the GMMP as well <br />as PROS Leadership's opinion, this level of service and the expectation of Tong -term <br />FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMUNICATION <br />