My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 05 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 05 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 11:03:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/18/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 05 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson closed the public hearing and called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Mayer asked Tom Phare, Public Works Director, whether the frontage of Dillon Road as <br />it abuts these properties has been annexed. <br /> <br />Light replied that there is a separate parcel within the Trillium Property, which is not <br />incorporated. <br /> <br />Mayer questioned whether the City has actually annexed the roads of these properties. <br /> <br />Light replied that he was unsure whether the portion of Dillon Road in front of the <br />unincorporated area was annexed. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that this brings up the question of who is responsible for Dillon Road. <br /> <br />Bill Simmons, City Administrator, stated that this would be referred to in the Dillon Road <br />Agreement, which was done in 1983 when the properties were annexed and the properties <br />agreed to improve Dillon Road. <br /> <br />Mayer questioned whether Dillon Road is actually within the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />Simmons replied that portions of it are, however, he was unable to identify which <br />portions are. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that the question of who pays to expand the road might be whoever owns <br />the road. He requested clarification on that question before the Intergovernmental <br />Agreement is finalized. <br /> <br />Sisk requested clarification that the Northwest Parkway would bisect the property. <br />Light replied, yes. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that he did not believe, however, that the Northwest Parkway alignment was <br />firmly established. <br /> <br />Light replied that Sisk was correct. He explained that under the Northwest Parkway <br />Agreement, it has been firmly established as a three hundred-foot right-of-way, however, <br />it can shift fifty feet in either direction. <br /> <br />Sisk expressed concern that the City of Louisville is going to be acquiring fee-simple <br />rights to the property that will ultimately be used by the Northwest Parkway. <br /> <br />Light replied that Boulder County would accept from the conveyances to the City the <br />Northwest Parkway right-of-way within the assumed corridor of three hundred feet. He <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.