City Council Agenda and Packet 1994 02 15

Home Browse Search

X*6iu1K Density. The proposal to replat is to replat into five lots for single family resulting in a density of 4.76 units /acre. The SI A- proposed subdivision complies with all or the provisions of the RX — soninq with the N+Xcsption of Lot frontage of Lots 3, 4, and 3, and _ a side yard setback to the public right -ot -way fo Lot S. Mayhoffer Ditch is proposed to be maintained as a surface ditch, cox,veyed in a 10' - 12'wide ditch easement running through hots 1 ant, 2 and around the partial cul-de-sac. Culverts will be necessary for the common driveway for Lots z - S. Bridges will be necessary for sidewallto to hou4ss on Lots 2 - S. The 100 year flood Plain carps show that it impacts Late 2 - S. The applicants have applied for an amendment to the flood plain sap. The applicant requested cash -in -lieu of in stood of the 15: land dedication. Wood stated that staff does not support the front Street eonfiquration, as it does not comply with the standard design criteria, nor minimum stopping site distances for front Street. - The Planning Comaissian approved by a 6 - 1 vote Resolution No. 1, — Series 1994, on January 11 with severe conditions (SS= ATTAUMD). - The seven conditions have all been met by the applicant. - Da%idson called for Council questions. Mal wondered who would own the 6' right - -way. � Wood: It would be the City'• right -ot -way. Mayer warted "No Barking" signs on both sides of front Street up to -- around the curve to preserve site distances. To:.! Phare, Public Works Director, was supportive of that. Woad asked Council if the sidewalk was an appropriate obligation for the developer any longer. Bar— Howard didn't feel it was necessary. a _ Hal agreed. Sisk moved that Council approve Resolution No. 7, Series 1994, with th4 amendment that the sidewalk on the south side of Front Street �`- be removed from the PUD, that the side walk on the north side will be continued, that the 6t strip be deeded to the City, and "No - 'i Packing" signs be installel. Seconded by Howard. Roll call was — _A taVen. Notion passed by a 6 - 0 vat^ with Lathrop being absent. 01CCUSS LOU/ DIRECrIOW - r_7J TEXKIAL It - VXKU CIK"T SUBDIVIBIGN PLAT s� M :LININARY PUD DXVILOPIMMT PLAN AND SPZCIAL RsYIXV UJZ - ( COPT' D. � ?1Klil 1/4/90 PaL.l Wood, Planning Director, stated that the continuance was given to provide time for the City Attorney to taseat =h what the contractual relationship between Mc:Sta;n Lnter ;r.ssr and the City 7 sss� DEL � � ,r` .A. , * f yv W: '. �, `sue � y am . ,( ' ,� 1. � � � � . �,,,q' a .r .... •vf. may., , , tie � a ... w i try �' ! �. i „=t +. �"' �� ` r7 r1aS 4 CJ�` 1v��:�� - �'. :..'L"'. '�R.r .. r.57�i!�LV�� - � �� C.A .''i- %a7�1�25!r l..a _ _ t