Laserfiche WebLink
-� JAr2W- ' 9d FR I 11:4 10 "FE. KT: <br /> ORMTHs 66 TANOVr. M. <br /> Maros malt councilmembe+rs - <br /> city Ot tAftioville <br /> January lo 1 994 <br /> rage 4 <br /> rbomer the applioent/ovnor acqutred over the past fifteen yearn a <br /> vest&d progorty tight in the multi- tasily uss w ith a denoity to 192 <br /> dwelling units plrr•+eents a cawplex legal q%eetion. Arquisants "jet ` <br /> on both fifer an this question. This applicant's position, in part <br /> at least, is reflawtod in Its letter to se dated Jaava�7r 11, 1994. <br /> a copy of vb ial th applicant apparently provided dirsrtly to you. <br /> As part of this nor* general question, at l east time following <br /> specific questions exist (this list to not ale- incluaive) i <br /> 1. Maether an ar► "ation agrreesnt enter" into after the <br /> effective oats of the anuc :tion is enforceable. <br /> 3. it enforceable, what is time tam of tba arnexation agrramnt <br /> and am or4mants to the annexation agreement? <br /> s 1. may the City and a property omnor regula 6evol powent of - <br /> property throwib .ubsoguont WWMXM tnti to &a wvwxation <br /> agreavent rather the through the procoMwee established by <br /> City ordina wol It so, wbat 11uits apply to ouch ammaxb ente <br /> Dcas the agreement avendn*nt prooses constitute an Lav" id <br /> "contracting away" of tU l"161ative MW quasi iudioial <br /> powers of lutuar+e City Cauiw11e7 <br /> 4. to the so- called "Centonnial Conceptional Mostor Phan <br /> (mcstaln)" an advisory plan aaly, or to A a regulatory or <br /> binding document? <br /> S. are the densities described in the agreements arms Elam <br /> advisory mwtiwAw only or aro they q am; anstmw? <br /> 4. Do the agreewmts exe"t the *pp li cant/awner feve all o r wvy <br /> of the City's subdivision, NG, 04 special male? use <br /> pr- oaedurso and standards? It so, which *$no? <br /> 7. alp It is the ottoot oat the proposed 1197 buildout agpeaxl " is <br /> the is7s aneiret4►tion &Wr*emoAt wW •xbl.bit? <br /> •. Do the agreamente provl4e MStain &n 4&tO roa4bl e right to a - <br /> spealtic Wombaac of bulidiny pe ralt■ annually? It eo, whet it <br /> wq lints apply to Umt right? _ <br /> 90 are the agrewwnto valid ur 4ex general aontrOctusl prLootplee? - <br /> A fituml desieion on thee& quwtl one could only be as" mama s court <br /> through litigation initiated bym (1) the •pplicautt/orerrt, it <br /> dJ*&&t is f led wifA C A Ly &ot Lon on the Pw4 iog eppl l+aat ion r o>r (Z ) <br /> time City s4m*Inmq JudiolaX qutda»ce on the reeavLng ear# application <br /> t,'Irt ► �i`.�� _ :"! }S [.�.w+r�tw��•.til'-••, , . O�Rr �s�'.:•.:�.:. ' IST .��.icc►,f►��'�� �',x,Ai',+l�l'�y�yl_,'� •'�,•f�y,x� � 1 <br />