My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 10 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2025 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 10 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2025 11:08:25 AM
Creation date
10/3/2025 11:04:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/9/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 25, 2025 <br />Page3of6 <br />code amendments also makes housing more expensive and noted that very few of his <br />employees can afford to live in Louisville. <br />Mayor Leh asked Councilmember Kern whether DRCOG has had discussions about the <br />code update. Councilmember Kern responded that the group has not specifically <br />discussed it but noted that there have been individual conversations among members of <br />the group that are in favor of moving towards the 2024 code. She cited that there are <br />some cost factors that have been identified by municipalities as they are beginning to <br />explore the codes. <br />Mayor Leh wondered how some of the changes that are happening federally with taxes <br />and incentives might impact the code. He asked if there are any federal incentives that <br />businesses can take advantage of that may no longer be available. He wondered <br />whether staff might be able to provide some of this information to Council. Director <br />Zuccaro responded that it's a broad topic and that staff would need to explore how <br />incentives that are generally non -mandated relate to the building code. <br />Mayor Leh offered that the IECC might have some information and added that <br />incentives may not be as big a consideration as he originally thought they were. Director <br />Zuccaro responded that it's not the City's intention to adopt a code that would have a <br />business doing something so outside of the norm that they would be relying on <br />incentives to meet the code requirements. Manager Zarate added that businesses don't <br />always engage with staff or programs to fill gaps, citing difficult requirements or small <br />benefits. <br />Mayor Leh wondered how many businesses are engaged with Xcel and will be <br />impacted by their program changes. Manager Zarate confirmed that staff talks to Xcel <br />about programming, grid capacity, and other things. She added that Economic Vitality <br />staff can generally help walk businesses through local to federal options for business <br />incentives. <br />Councilmember Kern commented that she appreciates that there are incentives rather <br />than mandates and emphasized increased encouragement for businesses. She <br />concluded that if the City is flexible and nimble, we can allow the business community to <br />be flexible as well. <br />Mayor Leh attempted to wrap up the discussion. He stated that there probably doesn't <br />need to be a motion but noted that the Committee can provide input to Council when the <br />time comes. <br />Councilmember Kern asked whether Manager Zarate had anything else that she could <br />share from the conversation with the Chamber Advocacy Committee. Manager Zarate <br />responded that the Chamber requested that residential sprinklers are considered from <br />affordable housing perspective, in both cost and impact, and that they were supportive <br />of moving away from the all -electric requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.