Laserfiche WebLink
A service, loading, and trash area is defined to the east of the kitchen. The area is <br />proposed to be enclosed by screen walls, though those are not detailed on the PUD plans. <br />Given the prominent visibility of the south facing screen wall, Staff believes it is critical <br />that the wall has similar materials and level of detailing as the adjacent structure. The <br />applicant has agreed to this in their response letter, but the revised plans do not yet reflect <br />that. <br /> <br />The site slopes significantly down from north to south, with approximately 30 feet of <br />total fall. The building is situated on the tallest part of the lot, with the parking lot located <br />on the lower and flatter portion of the lot. The proposed finished floor elevations of both <br />sections of the building are very similar to existing grades. The stormwater detention <br />pond is a grass-lined pond located at the far south end of the property. <br /> <br />The design of the parking lot has strong landscape and pedestrian qualities. The total <br />amount of parking provided is 197 spaces. Based on the Commercial Development <br />Design Standards & Guidelines restaurant-parking requirement, the site would be <br />required to have 382 parking spaces. Due to the varied peak usage of the different <br />components of the facility, the applicant has requested this significant reduction in <br />parking. Staff has evaluated the amount of parking proposed, relative to the estimates for <br />varied usage of the building, and generally supports parking at approximately 200 spaces. <br />However, during peak seasonal times or for some occasional special events, we would <br />not be surprised if the parking exceeded 200. The Planning Commission recommendation <br />would require the applicant secure shared parking agreements on adjacent properties <br />prior to issuance of the first building permit. <br /> <br />The landscape plan is fairly unique in design and includes many excellent native plant <br />species. The variety of materials selected is somewhat less than typical, but acceptable <br />given the overall quality of the design. Landscape coverage well exceeds the Commercial <br />Development Design Standards & Guidelines minimum of 30 percent, at 43 percent. The <br />Planning Commission's conditions of approval have generally been met with the revised <br />submittal, with one minor exception. <br /> <br />The building is proposed to be constructed of exterior materials of fieldstone and plaster. <br />The main dining and banquet portion of the building would be primarily stone, with <br />extensive window glazing. The main restaurant would have a standing seam copper roof, <br />which the applicant has agreed to quickly age to a Patina appearance to avoid having a <br />highly reflective surface. <br /> <br />The two-story kitchen portion of the building is primarily stucco, with a lower level of <br />detailing and window glazing, reflective of the internal uses of the building. However, <br />this section of the building will also have significant visibility, given the location adjacent <br />to the main entry drive. Staff and the Planning Commission have recommend a greater <br />level of detailing and the addition of some stone on this part of the building. <br /> <br />The building measures 32.5 feet in height based on the City's calculation of building <br />height that measures from average finished grade. The cover sheet incorrectly states a <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />