Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer asked for clarification that this would also include time to review, complete all <br />subdivision agreements and recording the PUD. <br /> <br />Wood replied that, with respect to this project, staff would accept the building permit <br />plans after recording of the PUD. He explained that there are a few agreements that need <br />to be recorded, such as setback and parking agreements, prior to the execution of the <br />PUD. <br /> <br />Mayer questioned whether it would be that difficult to complete the 1041 process within <br />sixty days. <br /> <br />Schneider questioned whether the time would be sixty days or would it actually be longer <br />than sixty days. He expressed concern that his financing, etc. would be affected by delays <br />that are longer than anticipated. <br /> <br />Lathrop asked Wood for clarification that it would be a minimum of eight weeks for a <br />building permit. <br /> <br />Wood replied that it would be ten to twelve weeks. <br /> <br />He asked Schneider whether the constricting drawings are ready for the building <br />department. <br /> <br />Schneider shook his head, no. <br /> <br />Lathrop stated that if the 1041 permit process and the time required to obtain a building <br />permit are roughly the same, Council should be able to expedite the applicant through the <br />1041 process in order to dovetail into the issuance of any building permits. <br /> <br />Keany asked staff for clarification on the status of the current process due to the overload <br />in the department. He questioned the fairness of bending the rules for one applicant and <br />not for another. <br /> <br />Lathrop replied that Council would not be bending the rules, but rather attempting to <br />allow everything to coincide and flow together. <br /> <br />Keany stated that it would still be a question of accepting this application but not <br />accepting others because Council is attempting to allow the Planning Department to clear <br />the current backlog. <br /> <br />Sisk replied that the application was submitted before the moratorium and it was <br />anticipated that the application would be subject to the 1041 process. He did not feel that <br />the moratorium could be used as a basis to slow down the process. He agreed that it <br />would be different for a new application. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />