My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 03 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 03 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
5/31/2011 2:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 03 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
None heard. <br />O'Connell thank <br />good change. S <br />cultivation of marij <br />decision <br />Page 6 of 27 <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />Closed Public Hearing — Planning Commission Discussion <br />Russell stated the City Council had given direction to address the regulation of <br />medical marijuana. He stated he personally feels it is a bad idea for the <br />community. He does not see how it will benefit Louisville to regulate medical <br />marijuana. <br />Loo and Sheets discussed the wording "publicly owned ". <br />Lipton thanked staff for addressing the questions / concer <br />expressed during the January meeting. The ordinances <br />stated he is not sure the community really wants this <br />community. He stated he will probably vote agains <br />Sheets asked Lipton if there were other option <br />Lipton stated it could be banned. <br />Sheets stated banning was not the dire e • rom City ouncil. <br />the Commissioners <br />ell written. He <br />of business in the <br />Heather Balzer, Deputy City Manager, ask -• • a• - °s the Commission. Lipton <br />gave permission. <br />Balzer clarified the direction by • cil. <br />Pritchard stated the Staff has don • ask -® em do and the <br />ordinances before us fo or revie e stated this is an <br />ordinance we can liv esiden •uisvil <br />ording change in Section 5, it is a <br />staff findings regarding the <br />ew of industry to make an informed <br />Loo -•Tthe a ® -nt • sented by Russell and Lipton have caused her to <br />de • - o not suppo - a• • • •n of the proposed ordinances. <br />Lipton ••ested the • missi• consider a way to craft the motion which <br />would di • -e with the ••licy. <br />Russell state® - feel o ° staff is capable of communicating the Commissioners <br />feelings to City <br />Lipton asked if the commission really wanted to put it on staff to express our <br />wants / desires. He stated that by making it part of the motion it would probably <br />be more effective. <br />Pritchard reminded the Commissioners that their responsibility is to vote on the <br />ordinance as presented by staff. <br />O'Connell presented wording and punctuation changes to Section 5 B.2 in the <br />ordinance as follows: <br />Within one thousand three hundred twenty ... or high school; a publicly <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.