Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> April 26, 2011 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> A. Approval of Bills <br /> B. Approval of April 5, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> C. Award Bid to Bobcat of the Rockies for Toolcat Utility Work Machine <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA <br /> Frank Herman, Past Chairperson, CCTV54, 513 S. Harrison Avenue, Lafayette, CO <br /> updated Council on the CCTV's activities. For the first six years CCTV operated in a <br /> deficit, but in 2010 the operations were split; the CCTV broadcast infrastructure was <br /> moved to the Louisville City Hall and the studio moved to partner with Catalyst High <br /> School in Lafayette. CCTV receives studio space without cost and in turn they provide <br /> training for students interested in videography, internet and content development. This <br /> dramatically changed the CCTV's operations and financial stability. CCTV has worked <br /> with the Louisville City Departments and engaged with other organizations to further the <br /> aims of the residents and the youth. <br /> COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS ON PERTINENT ITEMS NOT ON THE <br /> AGENDA <br /> No items to report. <br /> CITY MANAGER'S REPORT <br /> City Manager Fleming report was made under his performance goals quarterly update. <br /> REGULAR BUSINESS <br /> ORDINANCE No. 1592, SERIES 2011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 2 OF <br /> THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 2.50 REGARDING <br /> DISASTER EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2nd Reading Public Hearing <br /> Request for Continuance of 2nd Reading and Public Hearing to 10/4/2011 <br /> Mayor Sisk requested a City Attorney introduction. <br /> City Attorney Light introduced Ordinance No. 1592, Series 2011. <br /> Mayor Sisk explained the Council discussed Ordinance No. 1592 at the April 12 Study <br /> Session. Based on those discussions, it is suggested the ordinance be continued to <br /> October 4, 2011. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Richard Miller, 1230 Kennedy Avenue, Louisville, CO voiced his concerns relative to <br /> some provisions of Ordinance No. 1592, Series 2011. He felt the ordinance was far too <br />