My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2011 06 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2011 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2011 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:33:04 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 1:43:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2011 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOULDER. CREEK <br />a. Boulder Creek was neither the designer of the land plan, nor applicant for its <br />approval with the City of Louisville. <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or <br />district in which the property is located, not substantially or permanently impair the <br />appropriate use or development of the adjacent property; <br />a. In fact, the presence of the sight triangle precludes us from building on the lot as <br />it was intended. The granting of the variance will allow a home of similar <br />character to that of the surrounding neighborhood. <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is a minimum variance that will afford relief and is the least <br />modification possible of the provisions of this title (Louisville zoning code) which are in <br />question. <br />a. We only seek relief as it applies to the buildable footprint, and suggest said relief <br />while demonstrating that granting this relief will in no way impair the safety of <br />the roadway, based on current traffic engineering best practices. <br />In conclusion, our request for variance from the sight distance triangle requirement removes the <br />burden of a dated requirement that significantly impacts our ability to utilize the buildable <br />footprint in a manner consistent with the original intent and adjacent lots. Further, allowing <br />variance from this requirement, as demonstrated by the attached supporting engineering <br />documents, in no way reduces the roadway and intersection safety. <br />Thank you for your time in considering this request. I am available to answer any questions or <br />concerns that you may have. <br />Respectfully, <br />David Gregg <br />Boulder Creek Life & Horne <br />Architect/ Owner <br />841 Front Street — Louisville, CO 80027 <br />www.LiveBoulderCreek.com p. 303-544-5857 f. 303-544-6099 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.