Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2011 06 15

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes April 20, 2011 Page 2 of 4 The Harris's indicated they were ready to proceed with the hearing. Public Notice Verification: Jasiak requested public notice verification. McMillan verified the public notice was published in the Camera on April 6, 2011; posted in City Hall, the Public Library, the Recreation Center and the Courts and Police Building on April 6, 2011; mailed to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject property on April 6, 2011; the property was posted with the required signage. Development review fees were paid. A motion was made and seconded to accept the Public Noti rification information as presented by staff. Motion passed by voice vote. Board Member Verification of site visits. ex parte costae: licts of interest: Jasiak requested Board Member Verification of site i , ex par M •ntacts and conflicts of interest. All board members present reported they ha and no conflicts of interest. Staff Presentation of Facts and Issues: McMillan summarized the request with the follow' ▪ A variance to allow for the a existing two car garage of� ▪ The proposed changes inc to create a mud • •m and 2) to the south ition o If the bre . y is e sed, tN the ho en, the • ge is r setback McMillan continued criterion # ad 3 e a site visit, had no . rte contacts ussion points: m and a third bay to the pruce St. eway would be enclosed d be extended 14.5 feet gara y. rage is then considered to be attached to red to meet the primary structure criteria for approval. He stated een ni= ~ criterion #4, 5, and 6 have been met. NOT e recordi '•.uip KK malfunctioned and the transcription of the hearing was lost. equipment st• to ` on again at the time of motion made by Chancellor. The m s that follow M rom s p f's recollection of the hearing. Questions from: oard to Board member: ked tions about attached vs. detached structures and how they are defined. Boa <:• ' •ers also asked questions about other lots in the subdivision and whether or not had attached garages. Applicant Presentation and questions from the Board to the applicant: Vernon Harris (applicant) gave a brief presentation of their plans to construct an addition to their garage and enclose the mudroom. He indicated that this was the best place for the addition because it would have the least impacts on neighbors. The board questioned if the applicant had considered other locations for the garage. Public Present in Opposition of Application: None heard.