Laserfiche WebLink
year requesting to be included in the design process for this area. She stated that the club <br />was not contacted and that is why many individuals are present tonight to speak to <br />Council. She stated that the Louisville Trowel & Error Garden Club contains members <br />with knowledge about the soil and climate of Louisville. She compared the area to an <br />historical building that should be preserved. She expressed support for preserving this <br />piece of prairie. She stated that she would prefer an adaptation of a native prairie <br />landscape as an entry into Louisville over a landscaped gateway. She requested that <br />Council delay the project to allow residents the opportunity to provide input on the <br />project. <br /> <br />Davidson explained that Counci1 could not make any decisions, as this is not an agenda <br />item. He admitted that he was not completely familiar with the project but stated that he <br />would discuss it with the City Administrator. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that construction would begin prior to the next Council meeting; and <br />suggested that Council provide some direction tonight. <br /> <br />Davidson explained that he would prefer to meet with the City Administrator to obtain <br />additional information and then poll Council for their input. He stated that the item is not <br />on the Agenda, therefore, Council cannot take any action tonight. <br /> <br />Mayer agreed that this area is a unique resource and encouraged Council to delay the <br />construction of the entryway. <br /> <br />Jay Berger, 1016 Main Street, Louisville, thanked those in attendance tonight with <br />information on this piece of property. He stated that if the City had an open space <br />advisory board, this would not have happened, as there would have been regularly <br />scheduled meetings for public input. He explained that the concerns of the citizens would <br />have been taken into consideration and recommendations would have been given to the <br />appropriate City staff and City Council members. He stated that the initiative process is a <br />democratic right that is guaranteed by the Constitution to the State of Colorado, and it is <br />also available to the citizens at a municipal level. He felt that this method of creating <br />legislation deserves as much respect, if not more, than traditional methods of creating <br />legislation. He stated that on October 21, 1999, a citizens group presented to the City an <br />initiative containing over one thousand fifty signatures. The signers of the initiative took <br />the time to participate in a democratic process. They considered the initiative's topic, <br />they read the summaries, and they asked questions. He stated that most of the signers <br />were excited about the initiative and felt that it was worthy of consideration by the <br />population of Louisville. He explained that he thought the citizens who signed .the <br />initiative expected a response from the City to the presentation of their signed initiative <br />that would be respectful, or dignified at least. He stated that the only responses they have <br />received are the comments of Mayor Davidson. He stated that the Mayor vows to <br />campaign against the citizen board and that he is opposed to the board. Berger agreed that <br />the Mayor is free to have his own opinion. He stated that the Mayor calls the citizens' <br />initiative 'a ridiculous proposal, an idiotic proposal'. He stated that he does not believe <br />that the citizens who signed the initiative expected to begin a brawl as soon as it was <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />