My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2011 07 12 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2011 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2011 07 12 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:10:52 PM
Creation date
8/22/2011 10:25:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2011 07 12 SP Joint Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
structures without a future plan often results in empty lots. If the applicant has no plan for the <br />site, there is no pressing need to destroy historic resources. <br />City Council and the voters of Louisville have many times in the past confirmed that the <br />preservation of the character of Louisville is a high priority. LMC §15.36.200.A states, "The <br />purpose of the review of applications for demolition, moving, and removal of buildings that are <br />over 50 years old is to prevent the loss of buildings that may have historical or architectural <br />significance." Council provided in Ordinance No. 1563 (2005) that, "WHEREAS, in adopting <br />this ordinance, it is the intent of the City Council to create a method to draw a reasonable balance <br />between private property rights and the public interest in preserving Louisville's unique historic <br />character by ensuring that demolition of, moving, or alterations to properties of historic value <br />shall be carefully considered for impact to the property's contribution to Louisville's heritage." <br />Further, providing that a development plan be filed with demolition applications can only help <br />the City fulfill the PUD review requirements, which state in part that, "The proposal should <br />utilize and preserve existing vegetation, land forms, waterways, and historical or archaeological <br />sites in the best manner possible." LMC §17.28.120.B.4. <br />Requiring that development plans be provided with demolition applications is consistent with the <br />goals of these provisions and would help the HPC have a more effective dialogue with property <br />owners and developers. Many recent projects have benefited from discussing the balance of <br />preservation and development. <br />Thank you for your consideration of this important issue. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.