Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2011 04 18

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 18, 2011 Page 3 of 6 Stewart stated the language the Commission has before them is language that was drafted by the HPC in past meetings. He added the language should include a statement requiring a PUD prior to submittal of a demolition application. City Council seems to be in support of having a concept plan. McCartney asked the Commission to what extent they would like to receive a site plan. Koertje stated he would like to see a site plan primarily to work with the applicant to save the structure. The Commission asked staff to give a standard submittal process. McCartney gave a typical submittal process. Stewart read from the Town of Breckenridge code of laws in regards to a submittal process. It states a demolition application may not happen prior to submittal of a PUD. John Leary stated he believed the demolition process should be integrated into the PUD process. Stewart asked if Leary recommended this primarily for commercial projects or if it should be included for residential projects. Leary stated he believed it would be primarily for larger PUD project – both commercial and residential. McCartney reminded the commission a PUD process is already included in the existing demolition language. Speier asked Leary if he was recommending if more incentives should be included in the proposed language. Leary answered in the affirmative. Stewart asked staff if the HPC is typically given referrals on requests for PUD’s. McCartney stated only if the PUD involves an historical structure. He added most of the comments received from the HPC have to do with the historical structures and any proposed amendments to the structures. Stewart stated the HPC’s purview should allow them to give options and alternatives to the plans. Leary asked if there was any way to include a reference to Section 17.28.120.B in the language. Stewart answered in the affirmative.