My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Louisville Housing Authority Agenda and Packet 2011 09 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HOUSING AUTHORITY
>
2011 Louisville Housing Authority Agendas and Packets
>
Louisville Housing Authority Agenda and Packet 2011 09 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:18:05 PM
Creation date
9/23/2011 11:46:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LHAPKT 2011 09 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
If the current tenants received location vouchers at Hillside, you could borrow $700,000 800,000 that could be usable in <br />other places. Once you are rid of the tax credit situation at Lydia Morgan, you could do the same. It's worth $1.2 million. <br />It does need to be refinanced and meet some needs without taking on a lot more debt. <br />Regal Court I needs operating efficiency. Maybe you could do a cooperating deal with BCHA to put them all into a <br />partnership. Regal Square it is operating pretty well with a few capital needs. <br />Acme land may have a better use than as affordable housing. It might be saleable for cash that could be applied somewhere <br />else. In the meantime, it works. <br />If you take existing units and put them into a partnership, a low income housing tax credit project, the investors will want <br />substantial rehabilitation. $25,000 a unit upgrades are not needed in most cases. The use of that tax credit must be done <br />carefully and judicially. Prices for tax credits are back where they were in 2007. <br />Scott asked when the concept of restructuring was brought in the spring it seemed like a fabulous idea. Now HUD is not as <br />encouraging as they were before. <br />Steve Clark said that every government agency, including HUD, is trying to find every way in the world to save budget <br />dollars. Normally relocation and replacement vouchers are much more highly scrutinized. They want to make sure the <br />plan you have leverages new housing, adds value, and solves problems. <br />Chuck said that HUD is going to look at the cost impact of going through disposition and what it would cost the federal <br />level as far as per unit tenant protection vouchers. Their per -unit allocation, on a monthly basis, is about $425 month in <br />subsidy. With tenant protection vouchers, it is probably double. The advantage we have is that it is such a small portfolio <br />that the HUD regional office would look at that in our favor. They are still approving disposition applications and are <br />mindful of the story that is being told. 6 8 months is all it would take from start to finish. Frank and I have already done <br />the majority of that. <br />Frank said we would need to bring this back to the board for budgetary approval. Each one of these pieces would require <br />an up -front planning allocation from your reserves. We would need to break down the budget for each item and get your <br />approval to move forward with the work. That would lead to applications being submitted. We are close to recommending <br />that. <br />Steve Underhill said he said he thinks it's a fabulous idea and we probably should pursue it. He is stepping back, as he is <br />leaving the board, and won't be involved in the fmal decision making. <br />He explained to Kelly said that the Lydia Morgan property is subject to Public Housing voucher. The tenant only pays 1/ 3 <br />of their income. The rent is "market" rent and HUD pays the remainder. There is a disposition program at HUD, whereby <br />you can sell the property to an affiliated partnership. In our case, we can recapitalize it at market rate, with the proviso that <br />the tenant would get replacement vouchers where they could stay there or go elsewhere. We could then take that money, <br />the $800,000, out of that project and use it to leverage for a new building or capital improvements. <br />Property Management/Maintenance Report <br />Rent and Occupancy Update <br />Sally said that we are experiencing a summer time increase of move ins and move outs. Tomorrow we will have 6 <br />available units in Louisville. We have been actively advertising these. Hillside has two units available with wait lists to <br />draw from. Lilac Place has an application and will be rented Oct. 1st and a showing schedule for 5 on the other available <br />unit. At Lydia Morgan we have a vacancy and it is already signed. August 31S vacate already has an application. Regal II <br />is leased for Sept. 20. At Sunnyside the two bedroom has scheduled showing. The other two bedroom is advertised now. <br />The 3- bedroom is leased for Nov. 1S By the end of September the 11 vacancies are almost all actively leased. <br />Monthly Rental Vacancy Report <br />Karen gave a presentation on the Sunnyside Toddler playground. After looking at 4 companies we don't want to go with <br />wood structures. We are looking at expenses of between $22,000- $23,000. We are looking at rubber matting at $10,000. <br />It is a poured rubber surface that is safe and can't be picked up by the children. It's a small area, 25'x28', with slides and a <br />climbing area with a traverse bar, geared to children from 2 10 years of age. Swings are not recommended. The impact <br />on insurance is not known, but should be minimal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.