Laserfiche WebLink
preservation, but also from a lack of real <br />access which increasingly means online <br />access. Alone, smaller libraries and cultural <br />institutions simply do not have the capacity <br />to make hidden collections universally <br />available, but the public increasingly <br />expects digital services, including digital <br />collections, to be a standard part of a public <br />library's services. <br />Several courses of action would help bring <br />these hidden collections to light. <br />Possible Solutions <br />Creating a new national program. The most <br />direct and comprehensive way to <br />accomplish this goal would be to create a <br />program that targets hidden collections for <br />digitization and then creates a national <br />digital repository to ensure public access to <br />the digital files. <br />The federal <br />government funds <br />large -scale digiti- <br />zation initiatives <br />through several <br />agencies and insti- <br />tutions including <br />the Library of <br />Congress, the <br />National Endow- <br />ment for the <br />Humanities, the <br />Institute of Museum <br />and Library Services <br />(IMLS), the Smithsonian Institution, and <br />others and could develop a new <br />program. Guidelines from the Federal <br />Agencies' Digitization Initiative provide <br />technical specifications and best practices <br />that could be used as a starting place. <br />Because of the wide reach and resources of <br />a national program, materials would have <br />the greatest chance of being found and <br />Case Study: Bridging the Distance <br />Connecting local resources would help <br />Weston County Library in Newcastle, <br />Wyoming. The library staff member who <br />responded to the survey noted that <br />distance is the biggest problem: "I have <br />been told repeatedly about various <br />libraries across the state that have <br />good local history /genealogy <br />collections but none is less than a 4 <br />hour drive." <br />NUMBER 1 JUNE <br />made available to the public. Existing <br />technology, staff skills, and other expertise <br />could be applied to a new program for <br />hidden collections. Pilot projects could <br />begin the program on a smaller scale, <br />testing workflows and models for a larger <br />program. <br />Incorporating smaller institutions into <br />current Library of Congress or other <br />federal digitization activities. The National <br />Endowment for the Humanities and the <br />Library of Congress jointly support existing <br />initiatives that undertake digitization <br />efforts, such as the National Digital <br />Newspaper Program (which offers access to <br />newspapers published in the United States <br />between 1836 and 1922) and the National <br />Digital Infrastructure and Information <br />Program (which was created by an act of <br />Congress to preserve at -risk historical <br />materials). <br />Programs such as <br />these could be <br />extended to smaller <br />institutions. Both <br />projects are major <br />initiatives that include <br />a tremendous number <br />of items on a <br />nationwide scale and <br />work with dozens of <br />institutions all over <br />the country. This <br />alternative would require raising <br />significantly more funds or diverting funds <br />from other priorities at a time when funding <br />is especially scarce. <br />Expanding the IMLS Digital Collections and <br />Content (DCC) project. The IMLS collects <br />information about digital projects from <br />institutions that received funds through its <br />grant programs. Participants can add their <br />own collections to the DCC repository, <br />Digitizing Hidden Collections in Public Libraries I 5 <br />