My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 03 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 03 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 10:38:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/7/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 03 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
removed to provide additional maneuvering area out of the dead-end drive aisle, and that <br />the substituted two Pinon Pines are within the CDDSG guidelines. <br /> <br />Sisk asked the applicant if he had an opportunity to review the Architect's letter, which <br />stated in Alternative "A", "No crossing structure or access easement is provided to the <br />north in the alternative." <br /> <br />Hartronft stated that it was not the intent for an easement and crossing structure. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if a crossing structure would be provided in the, proposed Alternative A. <br /> <br />DellaCava stated that in the alternative of dedication, the ditch would be piped and <br />portions of crossing structures would be of a heavier gage. In the case of an open channel <br />ditch the developer would not be providing piping and therefore not provide crossing <br />structure. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Tom Phare what the City is responsible for maintaining with respect to the <br />ditch. <br /> <br />Tom Phare, Director of Public Works stated that the City has 20% ownership of the ditch <br />however, the Ditch Company has a right to maintain the ditch to keep the water flowing. <br /> <br />DellaCava stated that he was familiar with the ditch and the Ditch Company. He <br />concurred with Phare that the Ditch Company's primary concern will be to maintain the <br />ditch to keep the water flowing. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Wood the dollar amount of the cash-in-lieu of dedication. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the figure was calculated on a purchase price of $270,000, therefore the <br />cash-in-lieu of the 12% dedication would $32,400. <br /> <br />Sisk asked the closing date of the sale of the property in question. <br /> <br />DellaCava stated that he closed on the property in September of 1998. <br /> <br />Wood stated that it is within the ordinance to require cost estimates based upon current <br />fair market value based upon appraisal. <br /> <br />DellaCava stated that the property has been idle since the purchase. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Wood about the traffic study that reflected a 2% absorption, if that was based <br />on the 13,000 SF plan. <br /> <br />Wood stated that it was. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if that included the restaurant usage that was envisione'd. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.