My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2011 12 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2011 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2011 12 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:10 PM
Creation date
12/19/2011 10:02:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2011 12 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located. <br />There are 286 homes in the Hillsborough West Subdivision. Of these 286 homes, only 11 <br />(4 %) back onto a regional arterial road (McCaslin or South Boulder Road). Furthermore, <br />only these three homes in question back -up to a regional arterial with a curve. The curve <br />aims headlight directly at the properties. The unusual condition of having a property which <br />backs on a curving regional arterial roadway does not exist throughout the neighborhood in <br />which the property is located. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot <br />reasonably be developed in conformity with the provisions of Title 17 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code. <br />The proximity of the subject properties to McCaslin Boulevard and its curve requires the <br />presence of a tall fence to mitigate impacts from automobile traffic such as noise and <br />headlights. The six foot tall fence allowed by the Louisville Municipal Code does not <br />provide enough protection to permit the properties to be reasonably developed with a <br />buffer from McCaslin Boulevard. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. <br />The hardship was created by the realignment and widening of the road, and the removal of <br />the existing City owned eight foot tall fence. The property owners who back onto McCaslin <br />did not choose to widen the road, nor did they decide to remove the existing eight foot tall <br />city owned fence which mitigated the impacts from the road. Staff finds this criterion <br />has been met. <br />5. That the variance. if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br />There has been a City of Louisville owned eight foot fence adjacent to McCaslin Boulevard <br />since the late 1980's when McCaslin Boulevard was realigned and widened. That eight <br />foot fence has been a part of the neighborhood for a long time. Constructing a new eight <br />foot tall fence in virtually the same location will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood, or district, in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently <br />impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. Staff finds this criterion <br />has been met. <br />6. That the variance. if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is <br />the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville <br />Municipal Code that is in question. <br />The property owners have requested to install a fence that is the same height (8 feet) as <br />the fence which was removed. The request to construct an eight foot tall fence is the <br />minimum amount of variance that will afford the property owners the relief from McCaslin <br />Boulevard they enjoyed with the previous fence which was removed. Staff finds this <br />criterion has been met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.