My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 04 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 04 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 11:19:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/4/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 04 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 4, 2000 <br />Page 10. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion. All in favor <br /> <br />Howard asked that Council discuss and consider a Noise Ordinance at a future work <br />session. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 22, SERIES 2000 - AMENDED FINAL PUD <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MINOR SUBDIVISION REPLAT FOR THE <br />BELLA VISTA SOUTH SUBDIVISION <br /> <br />Davidson called for Staff presentation. <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director summarized the background of the Bella Vista South plat <br />and PUD. Wood stated that the plat and PUD were originally approved as a five-lot <br />development with four single-family and two multi-family residences in 1980. Wood <br />noted that in 1981, an additional lot was created through a replat, however, the PUD <br />amendment was not recorded and cannot be located and therefore the setbacks on the <br />original PUD remain in effect. Wood stated that the additional lot caused Lots 3-6 to <br />become difficult to build upon. <br /> <br />With respect to the replat and subdivision agreement, Wood stated that this is only <br />applicable to Lot 3. The lot was reduced in size to create the required Outlot, dedicated <br />to the City for an additional right-of-way for street connection. Wood stated that the <br />applicant is requesting fee in-lieu of land dedication and that Staff recommends approval <br />that would require payment of the fee prior to recordation of the plat and PUD. <br /> <br />With respect to the proposed yard and bulk regulations, Wood stated that the applicant <br />requested exception to the district requirement of setbacks. Wood noted that the Planning <br />Commission supported the requested reduction in required setbacks. However, because of <br />the higher volume of traffic on Bella Vista Drive, the 25-foot setback was not reduced <br />through this PUD and fencing is limited along Bella Vista Drive. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the PUD <br />amendment and minor replat with conditions, and recommended that the applicant not be <br />required to landscape the Outlot being dedicated to the City for future right-of-way. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />Phil Geil, 897 Meadow Glen Drive, Boulder, stated that he is the Attorney representing <br />the owners of Belvista LLC. He reviewed that they began work on the project four years <br />ago. When it was realized that the PUD had not been recorded, they had to start all over. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.