My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 06 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 06 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
2/2/2004 10:59:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/20/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 06 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />June 20, 2000 <br />Page 15. <br /> <br />Phare stated that the City has one large storm sewer, two sanitary sewers and a small <br />section of water lines in portions of that right-of-way, therefore, it is well used with <br />underground utilities. <br /> <br />Sisk directed a question to Fire Chief Chris Brewer. He asked which access fire trucks <br />utilize on emergency; the front door access or the rear access via the driveway. <br /> <br />Chris Brewer, Fire Chief, 646 W. Sagebrush Drive, stated that currently the front access <br />is used by large emergency vehicles, and volunteer fire fighters use the driveway to <br />respond to emergencies. That could change, however, as in past years fire trucks exited <br />through the rear door. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the procedure for fire fighters personal vehicles, when responding to an <br />emergency, is red lights and sirens and if the procedure is regulated. <br /> <br />Brewer stated that fire fighters personal vehicles are equipped with emergency <br />equipment, which use is regulated by State law. He noted that State laws require that the <br />normal traffic laws be adhered to, including speed limits and traffic control devices. <br /> <br />Sisk asked what access is used after an emergency call. <br /> <br />Brewer stated that the driveway is used to return the fire equipment to the fire station. He <br />noted that Main Street is so busy that it ties up traffic backing in fire trucks into the fire <br />station. He also stated that fire fighters use the driveway when responding to emergency <br />calls for safety reasons and explained that there is a potential for injury, when fire fighters <br />park their personal vehicles across from the fire station and then try to cross the street. <br /> <br />Brewer emphasized that the access is a driveway, not a street, has a higher elevation, does <br />not have painted lines, and is constructed of concrete, not asphalt. He noted that even <br />with an expanded driveway of 36', it would still be difficult to negotiate larger fire trucks <br />with public vehicles within the driveway. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that the Fire Department presently uses the existing 24' driveway, however, <br />the applicant is suggesting widening the access to 36'. He asked if the Fire Department's <br />complaint is based on public vehicles not being able to recognize a fire truck using the <br />access. <br /> <br />Brewer stated that the complaint is that 1) the fire fighters do not anticipate that type of <br />traffic and may not react in a safe manner, and 2) there is not enough road to make that <br />turn in or out of the Fire Station. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.