My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 06 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 06 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
2/2/2004 10:59:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/20/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 06 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />June 20, 2000 <br />Page 18. <br /> <br />Keany asked Johnstone the normal width of a driveway, if the applicant was required to <br />construct a driveway. <br /> <br />Johnstone stated that a commercial driveway would be 24' plus curb, for a total of 25'. <br /> <br />Keany asked Johnstone if two separated driveways could be put within the easement. <br /> <br />Johnstone commented from a general circulation standpoint, it would not be Staff's <br />preference to have two conflicting driveways. He noted that the Commercial Guidelines <br />recommend separation. <br /> <br />Davidson asked a LFPD member, who drives the fire vehicles on a regular basis, to <br />address the safety issue. <br /> <br />James Medina, LFPD fire fighter, 211 Lafayette Street, stated that on a fire call he drives <br />his personal vehicle through the driveway to get to the fire trucks. He then drives the fire <br />trucks out the front access and after completing the call, he uses the driveway to return <br />the truck to the fire station. He stated that it is nice to have an open space and not have to <br />deal with other vehicles in the driveway. Medina stated that he is concerned about shared <br />access of the driveway because it is extremely difficult to negotiate the turning <br />movements in the fire trucks. He also stated that the LFPD could be utilizing the rear of <br />the fire station for training or maintenance and use the driveway as an exit route. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Medina if pedestrian traffic was a concern. Medina stated that pedestrian <br />traffic is always a concern and they practice extreme caution with regard to pedestrians. <br /> <br />Brown asked for clarification on the diagram of the primary location that most concerns <br />the LFPD. Medina stated that when driving a vehicle, the entry into the driveway is most <br />critical. <br /> <br />Keany asked Fire Chief Brewer if cars in a shared drive would impede the progress of the <br />trucks that are returning from a call. Brewer stated that the size of the fire trucks requires <br />a large turning radius and that a shared access is not acceptable for safety reasons. <br /> <br />Keany asked about signs that required yielding to fire equipment. He commented that a <br />"Stop Sign" or a "Yield to Emergency Vehicles" sign should be visible to the public. <br />Brewer stated that public adherence to signs is totally unpredictable and therefore would <br />still be a safety concern. <br /> <br />Keany stated that he understood the Fire Department's position on safety but was trying <br />to determine whether there was a good neighbor way to resolve this issue. Keany asked if <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.