My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Minutes 2007 08 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2007 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Minutes 2007 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:22:23 AM
Creation date
9/26/2007 9:39:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCMIN 2007 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />DATE <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />the update of the Highway 42 Rezoning and Design Guidelines. <br />4. Next Meeting Items - 2008 Budget Hearing and Adoption, Brownfields Grant <br />update <br />5. Next Meeting Date - September 10, 2007 <br /> <br />Commissioners' Comments - <br />. Commissioner Menaker presented a motion to request a legal opinion <br />regarding the manner of termination of the Cooperation Agreement, stating <br />that it was being perceived in the community that the Agreement allowed for <br />the unilateral termination by the LRC. Mr. Light stated that the final, signed <br />version of the Agreement did not provide either party with a unilateral right to <br />cancel, and that a party therefore could not unilaterally cancel without risk of <br />liability. Commissioner Menaker stated the perception needed to be <br />corrected and the means for doing so is requesting a legal opinion. <br />Discussion followed about how the perception is not the reality of the <br />process, and expenditure of limited funds for a legal opinion to restate what <br />was already decided was unnecessary. The motion failed. <br />. Commissioner Menaker presented a motion to request a legal opinion <br />regarding the degree that the LRC is held to the same ethical standards as <br />other Boards and Commissions of the City. Mr. Light stated the LRC has <br />through its bylaws adopted the Code of Ethics set out in the City Charter. He <br />stated the ethical standards are the same but the difference is that the LRC <br />has adopted them by its bylaws which they apply to other groups by virtue of <br />the Charter. Discussion followed about how the perception is not the reality <br />of the language of the bylaws and expenditure of limited funds for a legal <br />opinion to restate what was already captured within the adopted bylaws was <br />unnecessary. The motion failed. <br /> <br />Adjourn - The meeting was adjourned at 8: 15 PM. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.