My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2012 01 30 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2012 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2012 01 30 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:32 PM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:36:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/30/2012
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2012 01 30 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Special Meeting Minutes <br /> January 30, 2012 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> • Those in positions of public responsibility should be committed to high <br /> levels of ethical and moral conduct. <br /> • Promote people's faith their government is acting for the good of the <br /> public. <br /> • Promote a harmonious and trusting relationship between the City <br /> government and the people it serves. <br /> • Strive to avoid situations that may create public perceptions of violations <br /> of the Code of Ethics. Perceptions of such violations can have the same <br /> negative impacts on public trust as actual violations. <br /> • Promote honest government. <br /> • Prohibit use of public office for private gain. <br /> • Encourage quality individuals to serve in public office by not placing undue <br /> limitations on their ability to earn a living and pursue other interests. <br /> LOUISVILLE CODE OF ETHICS VS. COLORADO STATE STATUTES <br /> The intent of the Louisville Code of Ethics is the more restrictive provisions <br /> control. In some instances where the Louisville Code of Ethics and the <br /> Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) address a particular issue, both may need to <br /> be considered to determine the more restrictive. In other instances, if the <br /> conduct is not addressed in the Code of Ethics, but addressed in C.R.S., then the <br /> provisions of C.R.S. will apply. <br /> SECTION 5-7 OF THE LOUISVILLE CODE OF ETHICS — DEFINITIONS <br /> 1. "Interest" (as in conflict of interest) means a pecuniary, property, or <br /> commercial benefit, or any other benefit the primary significance of <br /> which is economic gain or the avoidance of economic loss. <br /> 2. Interest of the following persons and entities shall be deemed to <br /> constitute an interest of the officer, public body member or employee: <br /> • Relatives <br /> • Business in which the official/employee is an officer, director, <br /> employee, partner, principal, member or owner (other than <br /> stockholder). <br /> • Business in which the official/employee controls more than 1% of <br /> the outstanding shares. <br /> • Any business entity in which the public body member/employee is <br /> an officer, director, employee, partner, principal member or owner <br /> (other than stockholder) where the business entity is seeking to <br /> advance financial benefit through an official action of the City, if the <br /> officer would be directly or indirectly involved in making the <br /> decision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.