Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 8, 2011 <br />Page 2of 7 <br />requirements for commercial and industrial zoned properties. He stated there are <br />some locations with an over abundance of available parking spaces. <br />Regular Business –Public Hearing Items: <br />Resolution No. 19, Series 2011, 1772 Prairie Way, Date <br />Extension, <br />a request for a three (3) extension of its approved final <br />planned unit development (PUD) plan pursuant to Section <br />17.28.200 (E) of the Louisville Municipal Code (no new <br />development). Case No. 11-026-FP <br />Applicant, Owner: CTC Prairie, LLC (Neil Littman, co-manager) <br />Representative: PEH Architects, Peter Heinz <br />Case Manager: Sean McCartney, Principal Planner <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Camera on August 21, 2011. Posted in City Hall, the Library, the <br />Recreation Center,the Police and Court Building and mailedto surrounding <br />property owners on August 19, 2011. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney reviewed the following informationforthe case: <br />A resolution recommending approval of a three (3) year extension of the <br />expiration date ofa final PUD plan for Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Business <br />Center at CTC (1772 Prairie Way) from October 4, 2011 to October 4, <br />2014. <br />The proposed light industrial/flex office building is approved for 98,600 SF. <br />The lot has 26% landscape coverage. <br />The parking ratio is 2.87 / 1,000; as well as 16 bike parking spaces. <br />The applicant is proposing no changes to the plan and there have not <br />been anyupdates to the IDDSG. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />None heard. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />WendellPickett thanked staff for the presentation. He stated the reason for the <br />requested date extension is because of the economic down turn and they hope <br />to see an improvement within the next few years. <br />Commission questions of Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Public Comment: <br />None heard. <br />Summary Comments and Request from Staff and/or Applicant: <br />No additional comments or requests were given by either staff or the applicant. <br />Closed Public Hearing–Planning Commission Discussion: <br />All of the commissioners stated their support for the date extension. <br /> <br />