Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 05 21

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 19, 2012 Page 3 of 12 Commission Questions of Staff La Grave asked staff a question regarding the deterioration. He wanted clarity on the stabilization of the structure. McCartney stated the structureis very stable, primarily due to the wood cribbing construction and the fact the building is built in 5 sections. Lewis asked about the grading issues regarding the grading. She asked if the soil had been added or if the structure had sunk. McCartney stated it is unknown as to why there is additional soil but it is evident the structure has not sunk. Having the additional soil would give positive drainage to the structure. Stewart asked whether the structure complies with the criteria regarding the restoration cost based on deterioration. McCartney stated the only evidence of neglect was two years ago there was a roofing issue the owner was forced to correct. Otherwise there isn’t any direct effect of deterioration based on neglect. La Grave asked how many other demo projects come forward without a development plan. McCartney stated he believed it was about a 50-50 split, but there aren’t any solid statistics collected to back up this number. It is not a requirement. Phil Irwin, applicant representative, came forward to answer questions. He stated the demolition application is due to the liability of having the historical structure on the property and they would more than likely recycle the materials.The current owners are not developers, they are just wanting to move on. Koertje – is the property currently on the market Phil – yes it is. Koertje – at this time there areno plans. Phil – no. We have had people interested in the property but most are concerned on the placement of the building on the property, as well as the proximity of the commercial storage building to the south. La Grave – how long has the property been on the market. Phil – 18 month, almost two years. Low key marketing. We have been very cooperative with the City on trying to figure out what to do with this structure. That was where the structural assessment came from. There is no one stepping up to purchase this property while the building stands as a liability.