City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13

Home Browse Search

Table 2 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats SWOT Findings This summary document synthesizes the combined result of the City (*Louisville, LRC, Boulder County, City of Lafayette, local property owners; and CDOT SWOT workshop meetings. Topic categories were used to group similar themes and ideas shared by the different stakeholder groups to illustrate convergent and divergent opinions; among. the agencies. Thetopic categories used in this summary are,bulleted below. Agency specific opinions that fall within these categories are documented in Appendix A. • 42 as a gateway,. • Speed and safet • Stoplights • Roundabouts Mobility Accessibility and connectivity • • • Physical constraints and right -of -way Open space • P rking • Commercial development, economics, and land use Economics Funding • Public opinion • Process • Commercial development • Drainage and utilities • Environmental Street edge safety,,: • Sidewalks and pedestrian access • Underpasses • Trail connections • Transit ' • Cycling Based on the topics discussed within each category, major findings are determined. Major findings are observed opinion, whether convergent and divergent, that result. Major findings are only reported when there are comparable agency statements. For example, if all three agencies discuss parking, it is likely that convergent and diverged opinions can be observed and reported; however, if only one agency discusses parking, no agency comparisons can be made and no major finding can be reported. Major findings are only intended to be statements identifying convergent and divergent opinions and the degree to which agencies agree or disagree. Major findings do not establish baseline 3 13 Positive Negative Internal Strengths Weaknesses Factors and views held by the organization that further or support the project Factors and views held by the organization that could hinder the project External Opportunities Threats Factors outside of the organization's control that further the project Factors outside of the organization's ``; �� ;control that hinder the project SWOT Findings This summary document synthesizes the combined result of the City (*Louisville, LRC, Boulder County, City of Lafayette, local property owners; and CDOT SWOT workshop meetings. Topic categories were used to group similar themes and ideas shared by the different stakeholder groups to illustrate convergent and divergent opinions; among. the agencies. Thetopic categories used in this summary are,bulleted below. Agency specific opinions that fall within these categories are documented in Appendix A. • 42 as a gateway,. • Speed and safet • Stoplights • Roundabouts Mobility Accessibility and connectivity • • • Physical constraints and right -of -way Open space • P rking • Commercial development, economics, and land use Economics Funding • Public opinion • Process • Commercial development • Drainage and utilities • Environmental Street edge safety,,: • Sidewalks and pedestrian access • Underpasses • Trail connections • Transit ' • Cycling Based on the topics discussed within each category, major findings are determined. Major findings are observed opinion, whether convergent and divergent, that result. Major findings are only reported when there are comparable agency statements. For example, if all three agencies discuss parking, it is likely that convergent and diverged opinions can be observed and reported; however, if only one agency discusses parking, no agency comparisons can be made and no major finding can be reported. Major findings are only intended to be statements identifying convergent and divergent opinions and the degree to which agencies agree or disagree. Major findings do not establish baseline 3 13