Laserfiche WebLink
Weighting <br />CRITERIA <br />CriteriaRank <br />Factor <br />0123 <br />Safety/Health10 <br />Safety/Health (drinking water regulations, No known or expected Suspected or mild Significant health/safety <br />Moderate health/safety threat <br />Federal of State Mandated9 <br />quantity or quality of water, physical safety)health/safety threathealth/safety threatthreat <br />No known Federal or State Potential Federal or State Known future (>5 year) Known short-term (<5 year) <br />Federal or State Mandated (regulation driven)Structural/Physical Condition8 <br />mandatemandateFederal or State mandateFederal or State mandate <br />Minor to moderate Significant deterioration, <br />No known structural of physical deterioration or condition potential loss of opportunity Risk of imminent failure, at <br />Structural/Physical ConditionOperational Condition4 <br />condition concernconcerns (rehab likely or still for rehab, near end of useful end of useful life <br />within useful life)life <br />No operational problems Moderate operational Jeopardizes mission/ability <br />Minor operational concerns <br />Operational ConditionReliability and Redundancy6 <br />currently experiencedconcernsto produce or deliver water <br />No reliability or redundancy Minor reliability or Moderate reliability or Presents a significant <br />Reliability and RedundancyCriticality of Infrastructure7 <br />problems redundancy concernsredundancy concernsvulnerability <br />Moderate impact to Significant loss of <br />No impact to production or Minor impact to production or <br />production or delivery of production or delivery <br />Criticality of InfrastructureImprove System Security4 <br />delivery of waterdelivery of water <br />watercapability <br />Moderate impact or Significant impact or <br />No impact or improvement to Minor impact or improvement <br />Security Improvement (assessment of risk for <br />improvement to system improvement to system <br />TOTAL PRIORITIZATION <br />system securityto system security <br />current condition) <br />securitysecurity <br />Prioritization Prioritization Description <br />LevelScore Range <br />Low priority projects. The projects are generally not critical to system operation and <br />Less than or <br />mission, or at least are not required within a short or intermediate time period. Long <br />1 <br />equal to 30 <br />term funding analysis should be performed for these projects. <br />Medium priority projects. These projects are typically considered highly important for the <br />continued operation of the system and meeting the water system mission. These <br />Between 31 <br />2 <br />projects typically need to be addressed within a short to moderate time frame. Planning <br />and 49 <br />should be performed for project funding. <br />High priority projects. These projects are typically considered critical for the continued <br />operation of the system and meeting the water system mission. These projects typically <br />Greater than or <br />3 <br />need to be addressed as soon as possible or within a relatively short time period. All <br />equal to 50 <br />efforts should be made to obtain required funding. <br />