My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2012 06 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2012 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2012 06 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:32 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 8:55:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/19/2012
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2012 06 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> June 19, 2012 <br /> Page 3 of 20 <br /> WOULD CONTAIN A TOTAL OF 160 APARTMENT UNITS AND STRUCTURED <br /> PARKING, AND 9,500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT ONE <br /> OF THE LOUISVILLE NORTH FILING 7 SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 707 EAST <br /> SOUTH BOULDER ROAD (advertised Daily Camera 4/15/2012) (CONTINUED <br /> FROM JUNE 5, 2012) <br /> Mayor Muckle reopened the public hearing and requested an Attorney presentation. <br /> City Attorney Light reminded Council as a result of extensive public hearings, there was <br /> direction to staff to bring back a resolution to deny the application for the Safeway <br /> project. He stated this is in draft form assembled from culling the record with findings <br /> included and could be approved as presented or changes could be made if Council <br /> desired. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Mayor Muckle called for public comment and hearing none, called for Council comment. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> Mayor Pro Tern Dalton pointed to the last phrase of the second page of the resolution. <br /> He thought the phrase indicated the 54,000 retail space was needed and wasn't sure <br /> that conclusion was accurate. He felt the retail the residents wanted was not likely to <br /> happen at this site and felt all the findings were subjective. He wondered if all the <br /> statements were necessary <br /> Attorney Light stated this document would be a record of the Council's denial and stated <br /> there need not be numerous findings if Council preferred. <br /> Mayor Muckle suggested exact numbers were not important, but felt some statement <br /> was necessary regarding a significant reduction in retail space being a problem. <br /> Council member Yarnell wondered if there was a need to look at how much retail was <br /> enough or if a general statement would suffice. <br /> Attorney Light suggested Council could add the phrase "extensive an" without specific <br /> numbers. <br /> Council member Loo was in favor of a more general approach. She thought it was <br /> difficult to capture the feeling of the entire Council as there were many differing reasons <br /> for opposing. <br /> Mayor Muckle called for public comment. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.