My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 07 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:18:28 AM
Creation date
7/10/2012 8:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2012 07 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />6/11/2012 <br />Page 2of 2 <br />Public Comments–None. <br />Reports of the Commission–Karl initiated a discussion on the review process <br />for new development, specifically when it isrequiredregarding redevelopment <br />projects at the Safeway site. <br />Main Street Patio Discussion –Aaron began the discussion regardingthe <br />patios permanent, since the amenity has gained acceptance. Items to consider if <br />they remain a ‘summer only’ amenity is how easy they are to move and how to <br />make them stronger. Troy noted staff would like a community wide discussion at <br />the end of the patio study. Currently there is $200,000 preliminary budget for the <br />patios. Mike suggested consideration for who benefits in order to determine who <br />should pay, and this was followed by a discussion on who should and could pay. <br />Carlos suggested that the patios be included in a larger package of <br />improvements with a shared financial responsibility. <br />Business Matters of the Commission– <br />a.A motion was made and approved to move the November meeting to the <br />th <br />13. <br />b.A continuation of LRC’s previous study session was conducted. Mike <br />recommended the planning/guiding documents be reviewed for <br />consistency. Troy discussed general conceptsfor development, initiated <br />by transportation and infrastructure. There was a discussion on the vision <br />for the area between the railroad, Highway 42, Pine St. and South <br />Boulder, what it should become, how it can be changed and what role the <br />City should play to encourage development in a particular fashion,without <br />discouraging potentially good investments and development. Carlos <br />spoke about what LRC can do to help the process, whichwas followed by <br />a general discussion. <br />Discussion Items for Next Meeting –The first half of the special session will <br />have Andy from EPS discuss EPS’s 2008 report and what has changed since <br />then. Members will also continue to discuss guidelines of the LRC <br />Commissioners’ Comments–None. <br />Adjourn–Meeting adjourned at 9:07AM. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.