My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 09 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 09 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:16 PM
Creation date
9/13/2012 9:32:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 09 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
While there are arguments supporting finding the property eligible, staff has <br />found this applicationdoes notcomply with the above criteria. Specifically: <br />Architectural Significance – <br />While the house has retained some integrity, it does not exemplify a <br />particular style or exceptional craftsmanship. Thereis no evidence that it <br />was designed or built by a notable architect either. <br />Social Significance – <br />The property’s long association with the Guenzi family lends it some social <br />significance, considering their Italian heritage, association with coal <br />mining, and Josephine’s status as an early small businesswoman. <br />However, no one in the family was integral to the early development of <br />Louisville or otherwise particularly significant. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The structure appears to have maintained much architectural integrity since at least <br />1948, but staff does not find the structure architecturally significant. It is typical of <br />miner’s homes in early Louisville, but there is no clear style to the house, and no unique <br />detailing. It was not built or designed by anyone significant, and staff finds that it does <br />not meet any of the other criteria for architectural landmarking. <br />The social history has some strengths, including the length of ownership by a single <br />family, the ties to the City’s Italian heritage and mining history, and Josephine Guenzi <br />being an early small businesswoman in the City. However, none of these factors make <br />the house particularly unique and staff does not find them enough to warrant a <br />landmark. <br />Therefore, staff recommendsHPC deny the landmark application for 1036 Walnut.If <br />HPC wishes to do so, it should pass Resolution 06, Series 2012.If HPC disagrees with <br />staff and votes to landmark the house, staff suggests the house be named for the <br />Guenzifamilywho lived therefor more than 100years. <br />If HPC wishes to landmark the house, staff recommendsHPC approve Resolution No. <br />07, Series 2012 approving the landmarking of the Guenzi house for the following <br />reasons: <br />1.The house has retained theoriginalform and somewindowsfor at least 64 <br />years; and <br />2.The house was associated with the Guenzifamilyfor over 100 years, including <br />Josephine Guenzi, an early small businesswoman in Louisville. <br />SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION: <br />Attached foryour review are the following documents: <br /> <br />Landmark Application <br /> <br />ResolutionNo. 06, Series 2012 (denial) <br /> <br />Resolution No. 07, Series 2012 (approval) <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.