My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2012 08 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2012 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2012 08 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:49:08 AM
Creation date
10/3/2012 9:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2012 08 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />August 28, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />two months that it's been out. There is also a financial impact to adopting the <br />2012 IBC, $10,000 to $15,000 is estimated for books, training of staff and training <br />the Board. It's rare to see communities adopt the Code in the first year it's out. <br />The Board wants to wait to see what other communities decide to do. City <br />Council was in support of waiting to adopt. <br />Councilmember Dalton, referring to the 2012 IBC Green Building Codes, pointed <br />out the basic function of the Code is public safety, and he asked the question as <br />to why should we go beyond what is required for public safety? Director Russ <br />said there is no policy on what to adopt beyond life safety, but he hopes the draft <br />of the Comprehensive Plan Update and the section focusing on energy and <br />green building will lead staff along a path to adopt 2012 IBC -Green Component <br />or Energy Section. <br />The 2009 IBC was adopted without the sprinkler requirement for single family <br />homes and townhouses, but Council did adopt more restrictive sprinkler <br />requirement for multi - family residential and commercial buildings. The BCBOA <br />and City Council will need to decide, or not, if the 2012 IBC is adopted will it be <br />amended to eliminate the sprinkler requirement for single family home and <br />townhouses. Councilmember Loo is in support of fire sprinklers in multi - family <br />and commercial structures. Loo also pointed out that the City of Louisville pays <br />the lowest mill levy to support the Louisville Fire District and that is because they <br />are mostly a volunteer organization. It would be wise to have the additional <br />protection of fire sprinklers. <br />Comments: <br />• The council communication for tonight indicated the 2012 IBC has <br />approximately 15% more energy requirements. Investing in energy <br />efficiency is good for the City and good for the economy. Mayor Muckle <br />asked if the City could adopt the 2012 IBC without the green building <br />code? <br />• Councilmember Jasiak encouraged the Board that as they look at the <br />2012 IBC to have conversations with the Louisville Sustainability Advisory <br />Board. <br />Update /Discussion — Golf Course Advisory Board (GCAB) <br />Ken Gambon of the GCAB presented the update and Joe Stevens, Parks and <br />Recreation Director and liaison to the Board was present for the discussion. Ken <br />reported on the "good news" at Coal Creek Golf Course: <br />• Phase 1 tree removal — complete <br />• GPS mapping of existing irrigation system and reprogramming of the <br />central control computer — complete <br />• Booster pump replacement scheduled for fall of 2012 — out to bid <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.