City Council Minutes 2001 03 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting March 20, 2001 Page 8 Planning Commission is required. He stated his preference to go forward with the annexation and zoning. He stressed the importance of proper planning and protecting the interest of all the citizens of Louisville. He voiced his belief that Council should adhere to the normal planning process. He stated that the annexation agreement is premature and should await the PUD process. Brown stated that this is a special circumstance, and that he recognized that there is a challenge in changing the prescribed procedures. He noted that this particular development, with the special circumstances and conditions, has been a good example of community cooperation. He stated that he was comfortable in moving forward. He offered a proposal for Council to consider an amendment to allow for flexibility in paragraph 16.e He suggested that after the end of the last sentence, the following phrase be added: "provided that a determination of substantial compliance, considering safety, municipal, physical and other issues that may arise during the PUD process." He stated that phrasing would allow the flexibility to amend the plan based on safety concerns, while giving the citizens recognition for their hard work in negotiating the agreement. Howard asked Planning Director Wood and Public Works Director Phare how much time was spent on the sketch plan. Wood stated that a substantial amount of time was devoted to this project and estimated over 60 hours. Howard asked Mr. Hine about his concern as to the location of the open space dedication. He asked if the issue was not addressed at tonight's meeting, would that reduce his fear of losing his right to challenge the location of the open space dedication. Howard suggested striking the section that referred to "The majority of such open space shall be located on the west side of the Property, as depicted on Exhibit C." Hine stated that it was a step in the right direction, however it does not guarantee that it would become a reality. Howard stated that Council could not guarantee anything until the PUD process is completed and that he was proposing an opportunity to present fairness to all concerns. Hine stated that if his words were incorporated into the agreement it would be a significant step in the right direction, in the direction of fairness. He stated that could be an option and discussed during the PUD process. Howard asked the applicant if striking that provision would cause concern. Spam stated that at the neighborhood meeting there was a consensus that the community would get the most benefit if the open space were located on the west side. He noted that they have added an additional 10 feet on the north. Sparn stated that the applicant could live with the change.