My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 10 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 10 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:16 PM
Creation date
10/15/2012 8:28:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 10 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 17, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Speier stated he did not believe there was much architectural significance, but he was <br />impressed by the work that Poppitz completed on the social history. He added there <br />wasn’t enough architectural detailing to make this house a showcase to the publicas to <br />why preservation funds were spent on this house. <br />La Grave stated he would like more time to review this request. <br />Poppitz asked for a continuation. <br />Stewart stated he believed this structure appears to qualify more as part of a historic <br />district then as a standalone landmark. <br />Poppitz state he hoped the bar wasn’t being set too high for landmarking structures in <br />this neighborhood. He stated there aren’t too many structures that could be eligible for <br />landmarking on this side of the tracks and some of the historic fabric needs to be <br />preserved. <br />Fasick stated landmark criteria does allow a structure of social character under the <br />architectural criteria, so the architectural criteria could be addressed. <br />Speier stated he neededmore time to review this based on the new information. <br />Lewis stated she could use more time as well. She then added the HPC needs to really <br />take consideration on this structure because this structure does not appear to be the <br />most impressive structure. <br />Stewart said he would like more discussion as to “what the bar” is if we are to set a bar <br />of landmark review. <br />Lewis stated we should definitely take more time on this subject. She then <br />recommended a field trip to the neighborhood before the next meeting. <br />Speier inquired whether the applicant could provide a preservation plan showing what <br />parts of the house he would be interested in preserving or showcasing. <br />Poppitz agreed. <br />Jean Morgan added she would like to speak with Joe Gomez, a longtime neighbor, to <br />see if he would like to walk the neighborhood to determine if there was a potential for a <br />historic district. <br />Stewart asked the HPC if there was an interest to have a special meeting regarding this <br />application. <br />La Grave said he thought it would be best to go individually to the house, prior to next <br />meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.