My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board 2003
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2003 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:18 AM
Creation date
10/16/2012 2:13:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSAB 2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Andrew Martin, Louisville resident — Mr. Martin is interested in a plan that lets humans <br />co -habit with native wildlife, that prevents urban sprawl, and minimizes human impact. <br />Mr. Martin did like Option 1 or 2 and instead proposed a trail that borders the Visitor <br />section of the Mesa. <br />Jay Berger, Louisville resident — Mr. Berger agreed with Mr. Martin and is also very <br />interested in limited impact on sensitive areas. Mr. Berger suggested a path routing in a <br />"backward 6" which would follow the existing crusher fine path in the northern section of <br />the Mesa, then create a perimeter path in the southern section. Mr. Berger also cited the <br />Open Space Ordinance which requires that if conflict exists between preservation and <br />recreation, preservation wins. <br />Mr. Craig Hazelton, Louisville resident — Mr. Hazelton identified himself as an avid <br />mountain biker and would like to see the existing trails retained. <br />Mr. Stan Udal, Louisville resident — Mr. Udal agreed with Mr. Hazelton and suggested <br />that closing off the 26° grade trail is "ludicrous." He asked if the trail could be made <br />more curvy to mitigate the severe grade. <br />Tammy Dick, 106 Barcelona, Spanish Hills — Ms. Dick likes Option 1 perimeter trail and <br />doesn't want any trails closed in the northwest section. She also suggested the 26° grade <br />trail section be left as single track and not developed further. <br />Ann Baumerhausen, 425 Kennedy, Louisville — Ms. Baumerhausen favors a <br />preservation- oriented approach and supports closing some of the trails in order to "think <br />of the big picture and try to preserve a delicate balance of preservation and recreation." <br />Susan Loo, 1020 Willow Place, Louisville — Ms. Loo said both trail options are ok, but <br />said in either case, a ridge trail needs to be maintained in order to accommodate small <br />children who are not capable of navigating the hills. Ms. Loo also asked what % of the <br />land the LOSCAB considers valuable. <br />Abby Scott, 946 Arapahoe, Louisville — Ms. Scott voted for Option 1 and advocated a <br />strong educational program be instituted and suggested using volunteer work crews for <br />weed removal. <br />Brad Sklar, 1318 Caledonia Circle, Louisville — Mr. Sklar identified himself as an avid <br />mountain biker and likes Option 1. He asked how effective the "policing" of any trail <br />closures would be and said preserving a patch of Mesa is not feasible. <br />Tom Grainey, 1149 Enclave, Louisville — Mr. Grainey agreed with Ms. Scott and <br />supports Option 1. He said trails don't deteriorate overnight and that after 15 years of <br />using the Mesa, he feels it is not in danger. Mr. Grainey said he is a preservationist from <br />Montana who takes a realistic view of issues and sees no damage to the Mesa. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.