Laserfiche WebLink
s <br />Cindy Lair — Ms. Lair spoke about the introduction of noxious weeds on or near trails, <br />including social trails and identified roads, trails, and streams as vectors for the spread of <br />weeds. <br />Matt Jones — Mr. Jones spoke about some of problems associated with social trails, <br />including soil compaction, erosion, and braiding. He also noted that trails typically do <br />not go on grades > 12 °. He also commented that the obvious erosion and the - nearby <br />cheatgrass is evidence that the social trail in the northwest section of the Mesa has had an <br />impact. <br />Bob Muckle — Mr..Muckle noted that attempts to close the ridgeline trail were not <br />realistic. <br />Bill Van Orman — Mr. Van Orman noted that he was in favor of the Varra/Muckle trail <br />option (Option la) and that the ridgeline trail provides access benefits to a larger <br />percentage of the population than Option 1 which includes a hill too steep to be navigated <br />by many elderly, physically challenged, or very young citizens. Mr. Van Orman also <br />noted his concerns about braiding and objects to the notion that social trails do no harm, <br />citing the existence of scars 100 years after the Oregon Trail ceased to be used. <br />Matt Jones — Mr. Jones made note of several historical, items, including the fact that the <br />Open Space Ordinance required the completion of the open space inventory and that open <br />space had previously been under the control of the Parks and Recreation department <br />which has a different management philosophy than Land Management. He also noted <br />that ecological value is a relative, not absolute, measure, and that even the trail options <br />under consideration represent a significant compromise from the ideal situation. Mr. <br />Jones said he finds the signs on the Mesa confusing and recommends the need for <br />educational, interpretive . signs to insure better understanding of access privileges and of <br />the value of the plant and wildlife on the Mesa. Mr. Jones also said he is skeptical of <br />those asking for more scientific proof re: the negative impacts of human activity and <br />suggested that specific, sensitive areas deserve the benefit of the doubt. <br />The Board then voted on trail options. See above for the specific wording and outcomes. <br />2. Draft Louisville Open Space Management Plan - The LOSCAB determined that the <br />significant changes to the Open Space Plan required additional review and withheld <br />comment until the next meeting on November 17, 2003. <br />Mr. Jones opened the floor for public comment. <br />Chip Heldman — Agreed with Mr. Muckle's suggestion that three properties be clearly <br />identified as appropriate for prairie dog colonies. He said he is saddened by the reduction <br />in prairie dog habitat and would be very disappointed if the City were to eradicate all <br />dogs. <br />