My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2005 11 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2005 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2005 11 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 1:48:20 PM
Creation date
10/23/2007 2:26:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5E5
Quality Check
10/23/2007
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2005 11 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Tuesday, November 22, 2005 City Council Study Session <br /> <br />Council members present: Mayor Charles Sisk, Councilmember Yarnell, Councilmember Clabots, <br />Councilmember Muckle (7:10 p.m.), Councilmember Don Brown (7:25 p.m.) <br /> <br />Council members absent: Councilmember Marsella, Councilmember Sackett <br /> <br />Staff present: Bill Simmons, City Manager; Heather Balser, Assistant City Manager for Governmental <br />Relations; Belinda Dogan-Pishner, Administrative Assistant <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Update – Status of Comcast Cable Franchise Negotiations <br />Ken Fellman, the City’s consultant on Comcast Cable franchise issues, provided a summary of the <br />outstanding franchise issues with Comcast. He also presented a brief history of the cable franchise <br />negotiations for the newly-elected City Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />Peter Stewart, expressed frustration that the City did not do a thorough job of determining the <br />community needs and asked for clarification on what Public, Educational & Governmental Access <br />(PEG) fees can be used for. <br /> <br />Discussion centered on PEG fees, what the fees can or cannot be used for, and what amount to charge <br />citizens for PEG programming. <br /> <br />Alan Soble, asked to commend former Councilmember Keany for his service to the City and recognize <br />newly-elected Councilmembers Muckle and Yarnell. He questioned whether the citizens’ survey fully <br />distinguished between government access and public access programming. <br /> <br />Jay Keany, explained that Comcast has already indicated that they are not going to provide anything <br />over and above what they are legally required to provide. He agreed that the City could insist that <br />Comcast provide over and above the legal requirements; however, Comcast could then force the issue <br />into court. He questioned the benefits to the City of becoming involved in a costly legal process. <br /> <br />Peter Stewart, explained that it is easy to lose track of what public access is; it is to give the minority a <br />voice. <br /> <br />Discussion – Boulder/Broomfield Transit Services Enhancement Plan (Boulder County <br />Consortium of Cities) <br />Clark Misner, Boulder County Transportation, explained that the Boulder County Consortium of Cities <br />has developed a plan to improve Boulder County/Broomfield transit services. The next step is to <br />conduct a study to determine the cost of implementing the plan. The City’s portion to fund the study <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.