My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2005 05 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2005 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2005 05 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 1:48:20 PM
Creation date
10/23/2007 2:33:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5E5
Quality Check
10/23/2007
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2005 05 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />May 10, 2005 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Gail Dunning stated that no one wants to have trashy dumpy vehicles parked on <br />a neighbor's front yard; however, she felt that this ordinance goes over board. <br />She requested that Council not penalize everyone who owns a recreational <br />vehicle. She encouraged Council to address safety, not esthetics. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk stated that it appears Council agrees the current ordinance needs to <br />be repealed and replaced with another ordinance. He encouraged staff to review <br />current ordinances of other cities in Colorado. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brown suggested conducting a public workshop on the issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk directed staff to schedule discussion on whether or not to repeal the <br />current ordinance at the June 7, 2005 regular City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Review Technology Plan Survey Questions <br />Julie Boyd explained that the home rule charter amendments approved by Ballot <br />issue 200 require the City to create a technology plan. <br /> <br />Section 5-5 of the City Charter reads as follows: <br /> <br />(f) Any letter, memo, map, drawing, plan or other document that is not an <br />agenda-related material or contained in a communications file and that is <br />submitted to the City Council or Planning Commission during a meeting shall be <br />immediately made available to the public either by making copies available to the <br />public at the meeting or by displaying the document at the meeting so that the <br />public can view the document. No discussion or consideration of such a <br />document by the public body shall occur unless the document has been made <br />available to the public as provided in this subsection (f). Whenever feasible, the <br />City shall cause such documents to be displayed so that citizens observing <br />Council or Planning Commission meetings on television can view the documents. <br /> <br />(g) The City shall make available to the public, at least on the City's web <br />site and City Library, agenda-related materials for each public body. If agenda- <br />related materials are unavailable in electronic format, each such item shall be <br />described on the web site. Within one year from the effective date of this Section, <br />the City shall have a plan for making available on the web site all agenda-related <br />materials. The City shall invite public participation in creating the plan. <br /> <br />Julie Boyd explained that staff has made a concerted effort to change the <br />process for gathering information for public meetings. There are fifteen City <br />boards/commissions for which agendas and agenda-related materials are posted <br />on the City's website. <br /> <br />In order to comply with the revised language and receive citizen participation in <br />the preparation of the technology plan, staff has proposed that an informal survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.