My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2001 07 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2001 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2001 07 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:47 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 2:31:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
7/3/2001
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2001 07 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />July 3, 2001 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Edwards have chosen to pursue a request for a PUD amendment for the 22 single-family <br />lots to which the 2,000 square lot/building coverage limitation applies. Wood stated that <br />the Edwards have surveyed their neighbors and have received written support for the <br />request from all property owners/residents directly affected by the change. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed the policy issue of the requested amendment and recommended caution <br />in amending portions of approved PUDs. He noted that a PUD is a master planned <br />development concept where variations to the standard zoning code requirements may be <br />made in individual sections. To the extent that if the parts are amended in a significant <br />manner, the intent of the overall master plan concept could be lost. He noted that neither <br />the Staff nor the Planning Commission found in this instance that the requested change <br />would alter the essential character of the overall PUD. The applicant has requested that <br />the City Council consider a refund of the application fees paid for the PUD amendment <br />process. Wood stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the request at their June <br />12th, 2001 meeting and recommended approval with one condition. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />lan Edwards, 615 West Street, Louisville, CO, stated that they have spoken to the <br />homeowners in the single-family and town homes and received written confirmation that <br />they will not oppose the PUD amendment and in fact, support the amendment. He stated <br />that since the lot sizes vary they want to be less restrictive but want to maintain the <br />character of the neighborhood. He stated that they love the area, and wish to add a small <br />addition to their home. He requested relief from the $775.00 fee. <br /> <br />Mayer asked if the house is single or two story home. Edwards stated that his home is a <br />berm house so that the first floor is sunken. <br /> <br />Mayer voiced concern over allowing 10,000 SF lots to build within 30 percent of the lot <br />area. He stated that would allow a 6,000 SF home, which would be by far, the largest <br />homes in Louisville and would change the character in the neighborhood. He stated that <br />to allow two story homes, and if bermed, two and one-half stories would dramatically <br />change the character of the neighborhood. He stated his belief that it should be more <br />restrictive and all the structures should conform to the neighborhood. He suggested that <br />small reasonable expansions to homes would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Edward agreed with the Councilman Mayer's comments and stated that they would like <br />to add 15 feet to their kitchen. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Mr. Edwards the justification for requesting a refund of the $775.00 fee. <br />Edwards stated that a City planner suggested that, because he was a single homeowner <br />and not a developer he may be justified in requesting a refund. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.