Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 10 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 4 of 6 Russ discussed the issue of how to check sales records. Staff would prefer to be able to assess the sales through sales tax reporting instead of having to monitor the applicant’s financial records. Russell, Robinson and Tengler discussed a way to have the condition address the sales record as a ratio. The example given was to allow a wholesale volume of 5 with a retail volume of 1. Frazee stated he would agree to a ratio of volume calculations. Brauneis stated a 5 to 1 does not sound secondary. O’Connell stated the conditions seems to be unnecessary because this is a special review use application and if there are complaints then the application can be called up by the Commission for a re-hearing. Lipton agreed with O’Connell and stated the SRU approval is revocable. Robinson stated staff is okay with the removal of the condition. Public Comment: None heard. Summary Comments and Request from Staff and Applicant: None heard. Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion: Russell stated his support of the application. He also suggested removing the condition as originally recommended by staff. Moline, Pritchard, Lipton, O’Connell, Tengler and Brauneis stated their agreement with Russell’s comments. Lipton moved and Pritchard seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 16, Series 2012 with no conditions. Roll Call Vote: Name Vote Jeff Lipton Yes Chris Pritchard Yes Ann O’Connell Yes Cary Tengler Yes Jeff Moline Yes Steve Brauneis Yes Scott Russell Yes Motion passed: 7 to 0 Discussion / 2012 Goal Review and 2013 Goal Setting: Russ reminded the board of the CC and PC Study Session set for September 11, 2012. He continued with a discussion of the 2012 -2013 Goal review and setting. Lipton discussed the importance of the following goals: subdivision re-plat criteria; Transportation; HWY 42 crossing; and bus shelters.