My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Library Board of Trustees Agenda and Packet 2013 01 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
>
2006-2019 Library Board of Trustees Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Library Board of Trustees Agendas and Packets
>
Library Board of Trustees Agenda and Packet 2013 01 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:34:44 PM
Creation date
1/22/2013 8:40:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LBTPKT 2013 01 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
All Participants (Proponents, Opponents, Public, Council, <br />Advisory Boards and Staff) <br />The public is also accountable for the public involvement process and <br />for the results it produces. All parties (including Council, advisory <br />boards, staff, proponents, opponents and the public) are responsible <br />for: <br />• working within the process in a cooperative and civil manner; <br />• focusing on real issues and not on furthering personal agendas; <br />• balancing personal concerns with the needs of the community as <br />a whole; <br />• having realistic expectations; <br />• participating openly, honestly and constructively, offering ideas, <br />suggestions and alternatives; <br />• listening carefully and actively consider everyone's perspectives; <br />• identifying their concerns and issues early in the process; <br />• providing their names and contact information if they want direct <br />feedback; <br />• remembering that no single voice is more important than all <br />others, and that there are diverse opinions to be considered; <br />• making every effort to work within the project schedule and if <br />this is not possible, discussing this with the proponent without <br />delay; <br />• recognizing that process schedules may be constrained by <br />external factors such as limited funding, broader project <br />schedules or legislative requirements; <br />• accepting some responsibility for keeping themselves aware of <br />current issues, making others aware of project activities and <br />soliciting their involvement and input; and <br />• considering that the quality of the outcome and how that <br />outcome is achieved are both important. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.