My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 01 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 01 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:16 PM
Creation date
1/22/2013 8:55:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 01 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Current Photos <br />A subcommittee was formedand conducted a site visit on December 7, 2012. The <br />subcommitteerecommended that this requestbe heard by the Commission. <br />ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY: <br />The existing structure is a one story national folk style single-family housebuilt in the <br />1890s.The house is cross-gabled, and appears to have been expanded to the east <br />after 1956. The siding and roofing are not original, though the overall form is intact. <br />The large windows on the west side of the front façade were lost sometime between <br />1948 and 1956. Other window openings appear to have changed size, and a front <br />porch has been added. <br />There is no historical information on the accessory structure. <br />CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: <br />The househas retained its form and massing, but many details have been lost. The <br />siding and windows are not original, not all window openings have been retainedand a <br />front porch has been added. The house does not represent a form particularly <br />associated with Louisville. The social history is strong, however, including a former <br />mayor and mine foreman. <br />Staff does not believe that the house would be eligible for individual landmarkingeven <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.