Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> January 8, 2013 <br /> Page 13 of 16 <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> Council member Keany asked how the City could landmark the property when the <br /> building is encroaching on another property. City Attorney Light stated the legal effect <br /> of the designation may be to draw a vertical plane across the property boundary. <br /> Council member Loo stated the City Council has every intention to landmark the <br /> property. She felt if the City does not secure a development partner the property will <br /> • remain vacant. <br /> Mayor Muckle felt the process would be the same whether the landmarking is done now <br /> or later. He thought the boundary issues could be cleared up after landmarking. He did <br /> not believe it would affect development proposals coming forward. <br /> MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Dalton moved to continue Resolution No. 3, Series 2013, to <br /> March 5, 2013, seconded by Council member Loo. <br /> Mayor Muckle asked whether the lot-line issues could be resolved by the March 5, . <br /> meeting. Planning Director Russ stated it would be difficult to have the Planning <br /> Commission approve a.plat to adjust the lot lines before the March 5, 2013 meeting. <br /> Mayor Muckle asked if that process would be more difficult if the property was <br /> landmarked. Planning Director Russ responded no. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Dalton asked if a further continuance could be granted. There was <br /> confirmation a further continuance could be granted. <br /> Council member Keany inquired what recourse a resident would have with a boundary <br /> line issue. City Attorney Light stated if it is an issue of redeveloping the site, the title <br /> company may want a subdivision plat adjustment or it may be a simple deed matter. <br /> VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 5-2. Mayor Muckle <br /> and Council member Sackett voted no. Council member Yarnell left the meeting at 9:45 <br /> p.m. <br /> RESOLUTION No. 4, SERIES 2013 —A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN <br /> AMENDMENT TO THE PARBOIS PLACE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) <br /> TO SEPARATE THE CONTINGENCY STOPPING THE ISSUANCE OF A <br /> CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR UNITS 9 AND 10 IN THE BUILDING 4, LOT 4 <br /> • PRIOR TO THE DEMOLITION OF THE EASTERN MOST HOME ON LOT 3 <br /> Mayor Muckle disclosed this item was on the consent agenda and was pulled to the <br /> regular business agenda. He requested a staff presentation. <br /> Planning Director Russ explained the applicant/owner, Hofstrom, LLC submitted a <br /> request to amend the Parbois Place Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) to eliminate <br />