My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 01 31
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Water Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 01 31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:50 AM
Creation date
1/28/2013 10:57:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
WCPKT 2013 01 31
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Jan 2013 Draft Revisions <br />Numerical indicators alone, such as the amount of water currently in storage, are not always <br />accurate indicators of a drought event. When used in conjunction with more predictive <br />indicators, such as projections for the amount of water becoming available from runoff, numeric <br />indicators are more realistic. Confidence in the projections of the water supply will vary <br />throughout the year, with the projections being most reliable during the late spring when quotas <br />are setand the runoff is more predictable, to the least reliable in November when only the <br />amount of water in storage is known.A quota is an amount of water the City is able to obtain <br />from a share of a water right. These amounts are set depending on needs of share holders and <br />availability of water. Therefore, the City establisheda predictive tool incorporating both <br />Deleted: <br />it is recommended that <br />numerical and predictive indicators to determine when the City’s water supply may not meet the <br />Deleted: <br />indicate <br />demand. <br />A Water Supply Index (WSI) will be utilizedto compare water storageamounts,projected <br />Deleted: <br />is proposed based on the existing <br />supplies,and demands for the City. The basic form of the WSI would be as follows: <br />Deleted: <br />and <br />CarryoverSBCdirectsNCWCDMarshall <br />Supply <br />last <br />WSI <br />() <br />DemandDemand(TargetedarryoverCarryover) <br />next <br /> C <br />() <br />Supply incorporates the amount of water carried over from the previous year (carryover last), <br />plus the projected amounts of water to be obtained from the City’s direct flow rights on South <br />Deleted: <br />(1) <br />Boulder Creek(SBCdirects),Northern Colorado Water ConservancyDistrict’sallocations from <br />Deleted: <br />, <br />C-BT and Windy Gap (NCWCD), and share yield of Farmers Irrigation and Reservoir Company <br />Deleted: <br />D <br />interest held in Marshall Lake(Marshall). Demand is the projected water use by the City under <br />Deleted: <br />(2) <br />‘normal’ conditions plus the amount of carryover water determined necessary to reasonably <br />Deleted: <br />tion <br />buffer the City from future events less carryover water in storage. <br />Deleted: <br />(3) <br />The WSI equation results in anindexthat will indicate the expected amount of water available to <br />Deleted: <br />a <br />meet current demands. A WSI of one (1.0) would mean that the supply would meet the demand, <br />including designated reserves. A value greater than or less than one would mean that there is <br />either an excess or a shortage of water, respectively. <br />The WSI can be used to indicate the potential severity of a water shortage and how the City <br />should respond. A WSI in the range of 0.95 to 0.85 would trigger a Stage 1 response. The <br />trigger for a Stage 2 response would be a WSI between 0.85 and 0.75. A WSI between 0.75 and <br />0.65 would indicate a Stage 3 drought and a WSI less than 0.65 would trigger a Stage 4 response. <br />Other factors may influence the level of response and vary from the response dictated bythe <br />WSI. <br />Projected inflows are based on historic relationships between snow pack and stream runoff. If <br />this calculation indicates water supply for a drought stage is less than required, the City would <br />enter the next level of drought response. The following guidelines will be utilized to indicate the <br />drought event under existing conditions. The guidelines will be adjusted as demand increases <br />and additional water resources are acquired. <br />Stage 1 <br /> - Projected stream flow and reservoir yields are less than 95 percent of normal demand. <br />South Boulder Creek direct flow diversions projected between 2300-2700 AF, CBT yield of <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.