Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 4, 2001 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />Pedersen asked for consideration on when the McCaslin Interchange Fee is due. He <br />requested that it be payable prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. With respect to <br />the open space and property value, he noted that the property values have plummeted <br />over the past 18 months, however, he would be open to negotiations. <br /> <br />Keany asked if 25% of the purchase price would be an acceptable amount for cash in-lieu <br />of public land dedication. <br /> <br />Pedersen stated his preference to stay with the appraisal amount. <br /> <br />Mayer commented that the Planning Commission's recommendation on the trees should <br />be considered. He voiced his concern about changing the species of trees and noted that <br />was not done for any other developer. He voiced concern that the southeast corner did <br />not have any evergreen trees for screening. <br /> <br />Mayer addressed the McCaslin Interchange Fee and stated that it makes maintenance of <br />the Interchange equitable for all concerned along McCaslin Boulevard. He stressed that <br />Homart paid over 5 million dollars for the interchange. He doubted that the State would <br />add funds for maintenance. <br /> <br />Mayer asked Wood what Koebel and Company had left to develop, in terms of retail. <br />Wood stated that Koebel and Company has one lot, of approximately 1.5 acres, just north <br />of Lowe's. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that in terms of cash in-lieu, there must be an understanding that the <br />Council vote on the entire agreement and not just individuals connected to the City. He <br />stated that the agreement was not ambiguous and said what was meant. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he had not made up his mind with respect to the automotive, but was <br />pleased with the balance of the proposal. He noted that there has been a lot of <br />landscaping utilized as screening. <br /> <br />Mayer addressed the Walgreen's sales tax projections and explained that currently sales <br />tax in Louisville is somewhat flat, and questioned the projections suggested by Mr. <br />Pedersen. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the applicant's real estate agent was available to comment about the <br />appraisal of the property. He asked what the listing property sold for. <br /> <br />Chris Ball, Fuller & Company, 3636 Decatur St., Denver, CO. He stated that he was not <br />involved in the sale of the property and not aware of the purchase price. He stated that he <br />is representing Mr. Pedersen in the leasing of prospective tenants. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Pedersen if the property known as Colorado Technological Center (CTC) <br />would be comparable with the property on McCaslin for valuation purposes. He <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />