Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 4, 2001 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Pedersen reviewed the Planning Commission conditions and voiced agreement and <br />compliance with condition one and two. Those conditions require the applicant to <br />provide an executed 20-foot public access easement and off-site grading easement from <br />the property owner to the north, and a note on the PUD that the oil change facility shall <br />be required to keep its overhead doors closed during the servicing of vehicles. <br /> <br />Pedersen addressed condition three, which requires increasing the spacing between the <br />trees on McCaslin Blvd. He stated that Walgreen's has concern for view corridors, for <br />safety, and marketing issues. He requested that condition three be modified to permit a <br />landscape architect to work with the City' s Forester in the selection of different species of <br />trees. <br /> <br />Pederson discussed condition four, which provides for the cash in-lieu of land dedication <br />to be 12 percent of the current fair market value of the property. Pedersen stated that <br />condition four presents a problem for the developer as they feel it is unfair to the Zurick <br />family. He reviewed the letters submitted as exhibits by the Zuricks, which outlined the <br />history of the development and referred to a letter written by City Administrator Leon <br />Wurl. The letter addressed Annexation Agreement and the cash in-lieu of property <br />dedication, which stated that the cash-in-lieu will be according to the property valuation <br />at the time of annexation, providing the property has not been subdivided. Pedersen <br />stated that the Zuricks have dedicated substantial portions of land to the City to build <br />McCaslin Boulevard and Century Drive. <br /> <br />Pedersen voiced his opinion that the cash in-lieu should be 12% of the land value at the <br />time of annexation, which would be $7,560. Pedersen stated that they have made <br />significant alterations to their site plan, the design of the buildings and added a retaining <br />wall, which have resulted in substantial cost. He explained that was all accomplished to <br />meet the spirit of the intent of the design guidelines. He felt that the spirit of the intent of <br />the Zurick Annexation Agreement should be kept. Pedersen stated that his offer of a 25% <br />of the 12% figure, $42,900.00 was a fair and asked that the condition four be modified. <br /> <br />Pedersen addressed the McCaslin Interchange Fee. He stated that they would agree to be <br />a part of a Special Improvement District that would collect the fee. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />Norbert Meier, 234 Short Place, Louisville, CO, addressed the 12% cash-in-lieu <br />dedication. He stated that he had written one of the letters documented in the Zurick's <br />exhibits, when he was Mayor of Louisville that addressed the cash in-lieu of dedication <br />fee. He stated that there is a disparity in the fee amounts of $7, 560 and $171,600. He <br />explained that at the time of the Zurich Annexation, the City was seeking out enclaves <br />within the City for future development. He asked that Council give some consideration to <br />the Zurick's on the fee and negotiate a fair amount. <br /> <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br /> <br /> <br />